Towards the close of the century certain additions were made to the
programme. In Ol. 65 (520 B.C.) the race in heavy armour was introduced
at Olympia, and in 498 B.C. at Delphi. This innovation was clearly due
to the growing importance of the heavy-armed infantry in Greek warfare.
Greek sports were, as we have seen, in their origin practical and
military, but with changed conditions of warfare they had lost their
military character and become purely athletic. The chieftain no longer
went to war in his chariot; his men no longer threw stones or light
javelins. Individual warfare was giving place to the manœuvring of
masses of heavy-armed troops. The introduction of the race in armour was
an attempt to restore to athletics their practical character. The race
was a diaulos, _i.e._ up the stadium and back to the starting-point, a
distance of about four hundred yards. The men wore helmets, greaves, and
round shields. At a later time the greaves were discarded, perhaps as a
concession to athletes who regarded such a race as a spurious sort of
athletics. Certainly the race never attained to the same prestige as the
other events.
In Ol. 70 (500 B.C.) a mule chariot-race (ἀπήνη) was introduced, and in
the next Olympiad a riding race for mares (κάλπη), in which the riders
dismounted in the last lap and ran with their steeds. In both these
events, which were discontinued after a short trial in Ol. 84, we may
see the influence of the Elean nobility, whose wealth and power were
derived largely from their horses and cattle. The introduction of mule
chariot-races may have been partly due to the influence of the Lords of
Sicily; the victory of Anaxilas is commemorated on the coins of Rhegium
and Messana (Fig. 168). The κάλπη is of especial interest. Helbig has
shown that the Hippeis of Athens and other Greek states in the sixth
century were not cavalry soldiers in the strict sense of the word, but
mounted infantry, the true successors of the Homeric chieftains.[78]
Just as the latter went to war in their chariots, but dismounted in
order to fight, leaving the chariot in charge of the charioteer, and
remounting for flight or for pursuit, so the Hippeis of the sixth
century merely used their horses for advance or for retreat, dismounting
when they came into close contact with the foe, and leaving their horses
with their squires, who accompanied them, either mounted behind them _en
croupe_, or on horses of their own. The Homeric custom survived only in
sports, in the ἀποβατής, whom we see represented on the frieze of the
Parthenon in the act of dismounting; the later custom was represented
for a brief time only by the κάλπη. As we have seen in discussing the
race in armour, the system of individual warfare was passing away.
Sparta had shown the superiority of masses of armed infantry. Previous
to the Persian wars, Thessalian cavalry had already been employed by
Peisistratus, and these served in the fifth century as the model on
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account