Greek drama (Tragedy) -- History and criticism; Mythology, Greek, in literature
The truth is that Creon commits a terrible act owing to a terrible
provocation. His act is the insult to Polynices’ body, which he maintains
at the cost of Antigone’s life; his justification is the fact that the
dead man, though a Theban, was attacking Thebes and would have destroyed
the State. Antigone stands for respect to private affection, Creon for
respect to the community. It is impossible to say at the outset which
is the more important, and the problem may well be insoluble. But it is
precisely because of this that the _Antigone_ is a tragedy. To accept
the customary view, and yet insist that Sophocles is a great dramatist,
is mere superstition; the work becomes the record of an insane murder.
On _a priori_ grounds, then, we may believe that Sophocles by no means
condemns Creon off-hand. It is not satisfactory to argue that Thebes
should have been satisfied with the death of the invader. Since he was a
Theban his attack was looked on as the foulest treachery, which merited
extreme penalty, both by way of revenge and as a warning to others.
(Just the same view is held by the authorities in the _Ajax_.) The play
presents a problem both for the king and for his kinswoman: “I am right
to punish this traitor’s corpse; am I justified in killing others who
thwart the punishment?” “I am right to show love and pity for my dead
brother; am I justified in flouting the State?” Antigone is only Creon
over again with a different equipment of sympathies. That one loves his
country with a cold concentration which finds enemies and treachery
everywhere, while the other passionately loves her dead brother, should
not blind us to the truth that Antigone has all Creon’s hardness and
narrowness, and especially all his obstinacy. That tenderness and womanly
affection which we attribute to the princess are amiable inventions of
our own, except the love which she bears Polynices. This love is not
to be in any sense belittled, but it is simply an instinct, like that
of Creon in matters of State, an instinct to which she will, like him,
sacrifice all else. If Creon sacrifices Antigone for his ideal, she
sacrifices Hæmon for hers. He shows brutality to his son, she to her
sister. That a compromise between the demands of the State and private
conscience is, however unwelcome, necessary, never occurs to either
party, and those who, like Hæmon and Ismene, urge such a thought upon
them are insulted. This blindness to the psychology of Antigone has led
to actual meddling with Sophocles’ text. In her last long speech occurs
a celebrated “difficulty,” namely, her statement[308] that if the dead
man had been a child or husband of hers, she would not thus have given
her life; but the case of Polynices is different, since (her father and
mother being dead) she can never have another brother. These lines are
generally bracketed as spurious because unworthy of Antigone’s character
and inconsistent with the reason for her act which she has already[309]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account