Greek drama (Tragedy) -- History and criticism; Mythology, Greek, in literature
Orestes, living in exile, has escaped the blight of Electra only to
become a criminal with no illusions, proud of his worldly experience,
witness the blundering disquisition on “the true gentleman,”[650] and his
cynical comments on his humble brother-in-law.[651] His onslaught upon
Ægisthus from behind proves him at the best deficient in gallantry, and
on the matricide itself nothing need be said. We can pity Orestes for his
fearful position, but he is a poor creature. The _Electra_, in fact, is
a clear-sighted attack upon the morality of blood-feuds. The poet feels
that Ægisthus and Clytæmnestra, left so long unmolested, should have
been left alone still; if Apollo at Delphi, and the peasant in his Argive
cottage, had estimated human nature more wisely, this horror would have
been escaped, and no harm done. To punish the guilty is not always a
virtue; often it is a debauch of self-glory, and sometimes the worst of
villainies.
As always, the poet regards the “oracle,” which commanded matricide, as
an offence to civilization. But there is novelty in the extreme candour
with which this is put forward. The Dioscuri repeatedly stigmatize its
murderous command as “foolishness” or worse.[652] Equally outspoken
are the chorus, who devote the last stanza of their lovely song on
the Golden Lamb and Thyestes’ crime to a brilliant denial of its
truth.... “But legends that fill men with dread are profitable to divine
worship”[653]—it is admirably put, and may rank with the epigrams of
Ovid[654] and Voltaire.[655] As for the Dioscuri, it is impossible to
speak without affection of such quaint and charming figures. Their
converse with Electra and the chorus is an irresistible combination of
dignity and a breezy contempt for official reticence. In his first long
_ex cathedra_ speech Castor is on the verge of saying what he really
thinks of Phœbus Apollo, remembers himself just in time, and then—gives a
broad hint after all.[656] In the less formal talk which follows, these
bluff naval deities show a soundness of heart and a simplicity as to
the meaning of great affairs which recall delightfully the traditional
nautical character of modern literature. The anguish of brother and
sister who after long years meet for a few frightful hours only to part
for ever awakes their instant deep sympathy.[657] On the other side these
subordinate deities are assuredly in a maze as to the theological problem
into which they have strayed. “How was it,” ask the Argive women, very
pertinently, “that you, being gods and brothers of the woman that hath
perished, did not repel destruction from the house?” Electra, too, would
know why she was involved in the matricide. In answer the Brethren offer
a bundle of reasons some one of which ought surely to be right: “the
fate of necessity,” “the guidance of doom,” “the foolish utterances of
Phœbus’ tongue,” “a partnership in act and in destiny,” “the ancestral
curse”.[658] Even if traditional phrases could solve the problem of human
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account