Greek drama (Tragedy) -- History and criticism; Mythology, Greek, in literature
The high-hearted defence[783] of Rhesus is full of the same tingling
rhetoric. Yet many critics[784] of the highest rank have denied
Euripidean authorship to the _Rhesus_. On the other side stands[785] the
testimony of the almost contemporary record. One consideration, obvious
yet too often ignored, may help us. The earliest work of Euripides to
which we can assign a date—the _Alcestis_—belongs to the year 438. The
poet was then at least forty-two years old. Is it beyond belief that
twenty years before the _Alcestis_ the youthful dramatist composed a
stirring tale of war and hair-breadth escape, which owed much to the
manner of Æschylus, especially in his handling of the chorus? During
the period for which we have evidence, he was constantly testing the
possibilities of his art. Need we assume that until the _Alcestis_ he had
not advanced?
The soundest view appears to be that we have here a very early work
of Euripides. This is confirmed by the critic Crates, an Academic
philosopher of the second century before Christ, who asserted that
Euripides was still young when he wrote the _Rhesus_.[786] To this should
be added whatever help may be drawn from contemporary history. It is
natural to suppose that when this drama was composed Athenian politics
were closely concerned with Thrace. An Athenian colony at Nine Ways,
afterwards called Amphipolis, was destroyed by the Thracians in 465 B.C.
In 436 the place was resettled under the new name by Hagnon, who brought
the bones of Rhesus from the Troad back to Thrace. The later year, as
connected with the hero, would seem the more suitable, were it not for
the words[787] of his mother who refuses burial for her son and proclaims
his strange life after death: “hidden in caverns of the silver-yielding
soil he shall lie as a human spirit, still living”. Such language would
rather be avoided after the bones themselves had been visibly committed
to Thracian earth. On the whole, one thinks the situation more suitable
to some period, anterior to Hagnon’s expedition, when Thracian politics
were in the air, perhaps quite soon after the disaster of 465 B.C.[788]
* * * * *
Of the lost plays we have about eleven hundred fragments. Few of these
comprise more than three or four lines, but a fair conception of several
dramas can be formed from reports of the plot, parodies by Aristophanes,
and the remains themselves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account