Greek drama (Tragedy) -- History and criticism; Mythology, Greek, in literature
Anyone who follows out these two strands of instinct will understand
much that might seem strange, much that gave offence, in his work. It
will be well therefore to bring together the faults which have been
found with him in ancient and in later times. Leaving on one side, since
it is by no means certainly a reproach, the celebrated remark[823] of
Sophocles, “I represent people as they should be, Euripides as they
are,” we find our chief material in Aristophanes and Aristotle. The
_Frogs_ contains an elaborate attack upon the tragedian which, whether
fair or not, has a _prima facie_ reasonableness. Euripides is twitted
with moral and literary offences. In the first place, his predilection
for depicting the power of love, especially the adulterous or incestuous
passions of women[824] and the sophistical restlessness of mind which
he inculcates,[825] mark him as a corrupter of Athens. On the technical
side, his music[826] is affected and decadent, the libretto[827] of his
choruses is both elaborate and jejune, the style of his iambics[828]
lacks weight and dignity, his prologues[829] are tiresome and written in
a mechanical fashion. Aristotle in his turn objects to certain weaknesses
of characterization: Menelaus in the _Orestes_ is particularly bad, the
speech of Melanippe—no doubt that celebrated oration on miracles—is
indecorous and out of character; in the Aulid _Iphigenia_ the heroine
is inconsistent.[830] He gives two examples[831] of the irrational,
Ægeus in the _Medea_ and Menelaus once more in the _Orestes_. Euripides’
use of the _deus ex machina_ is also often bad; he instances Medea’s
miraculous chariot. Lastly there is the famous mixture[832] of praise
and blame: “Euripides, faulty as he is in the general management of his
subject, is yet felt to be the most tragic of the poets.” If we pass now
to modern detractors, we find one fault overshadowing all the rest—bad
construction, what Aristotle calls “episodic” plots, namely, plays the
several scenes of which are more or less accidentally combined and form
no organic whole.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account