Her chief faculty lay in negations. Her whole life was a kind of
negation--a negation of warmth, a negation of impulse, a negation
of beauty, a negation of health. When Thomas was a child, her chief
communication with him was in negatives. "_You must not_; _you are
not_; _do not_;" and so on. Her theory of the world was humanity
deprived of God. Because of something awful in the past, something
awful lay in the future. To escape from the consequences of a condition
which you could not help, you must believe certain things after a
certain fashion--hold, in fact, certain theories with regard to
the most difficult questions, on which, too, you were incapable of
thinking correctly. Him who held these theories you must regard as
a fellow-favorite of heaven; who held them not you would do well to
regard as a publican and a sinner, even if he should be the husband in
your bosom. All the present had value only of reference to the future.
All your strife must be to become something you are not at all now,
to feel what you do not feel, to judge against your nature, to regard
everything in you as opposed to your salvation, and God, who is far
away from you, and whose ear is not always ready to hear, as your only
deliverer from the consequences he has decreed; and this in virtue of
no immediate relation to you, but from regard to another whose innocent
suffering is to our guilt the only counterpoise weighty enough to
satisfy his justice. All her anxiety for her son turned upon his final
escape from punishment. She did not torment her soul, her nights were
not sleepless with the fear that her boy should be unlike Christ,
that he might do that which was mean, selfish, dishonest, cowardly,
vile, but with the fear that he was or might be doomed to an eternal
suffering.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account