Gunnery in 1858: Being a Treatise on Rifles, Cannon, and Sporting Arms: Explaining the Principles of the Science of Gunnery, and Describing the Newest Improvements in Fire-ArmsGreener, William
History
Gunnery in 1858: Being a Treatise on Rifles, Cannon, and Sporting Arms: Explaining the Principles of the Science of Gunnery, and Describing the Newest Improvements in Fire-Arms
Greener, William
Firearms; Gunnery
In 1842, powerful influence being brought to bear, it was hoped that a
trial of my invention would result; and in order to meet the strongly
expressed public opinion, the Board of Ordnance ordered me to construct
them model arms on my own principle. This was done, and the trial
promised by the Master-General was demanded, but as obstinately refused
by the Select Committee at Woolwich, whose power was superior to that of
the Master-General; though he was fully pledged to afford me a trial.
Thus the progress of invention was delayed until 1848; sometimes
enlivened, however, by the bursting of a shell of intelligence in the
camp of military prejudice. Slashing letters appeared from time to time
on military incapacity. Meanwhile Captain Delvigne and Captain Thierry
continued their experiments, and on June 21st, 1842, a patent was
obtained in France, which is thus described:--
“For having hollowed the base of my cylindro-conical bullet, not only
for motives mentioned in the descriptive memoir given with my demand for
a patent, but besides to obtain its expansion (son èpanouissement) by
the effect of the gases produced through the ignition of the powder. By
this means the effort of the powder itself, which formerly caused
spherical bullets to deviate from the grooves, now contributes to force
the bullets of my system more firmly into them.”
In a paper published by M. Delvigne in the _Spectateur Militaire_, of
August, 1843, we also find:--
“In order to avoid too great friction I grooved the cylindrical
surface of the bullet; but, whilst I thus increased the windage of
the body of the projectile, I reserved, at the two extremities of the
cylindrical part, two circular rings of a diameter almost equal to
that of the calibre. These two rings fixed accurately in the bore,
secured the perfect position of the axis of the bullet, which the blow
of the ramrod then forced tightly. In case of foulness, they easily
gave way to the blows of the ramrod, and the axis of the bullet
remained in the required position. The hollowing of the sides of the
bullet gives besides the means of fixing on the cartridge without
increasing the diameter of the calibre. But during these
investigations, _I made an important discovery, which was, that the
gas produced by the ignition of the powder, rushing into the vacuum
formed at the base of the bullet, expanded it and forced it into the
grooves_. I here give the idea, a new one, as I think, and recommend
its application to such as occupy themselves with the effect of
fire-arms and powder. The following, however, must be avoided: if the
hollow is too deep, the expansion is too great, and the consequent
friction enormous; sometimes even the gas will traverse the bullet,
and consequently the projectile is deprived of a proportionary amount
of velocity; if too small, the expansion does not take place.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account