Gutenberg, and the Art of PrintingPearson, Emily C. (Emily Clemens)
History
Gutenberg, and the Art of Printing
Pearson, Emily C. (Emily Clemens)
Gutenberg, Johann, 1397?-1468
intellectual, should vainly search, like the brutes, its _instrument_
of morality and knowledge, without power to find it only after myriads
of generations. Humanity deaf and mute during a hundred thousand years!
I shudder at the blasphemy of believing such a mystery. I love better
to believe in the other; that is to say, in the fatherly mystery of the
Creator himself, inspiring on the lips of his infant creature, speech;
the word, the sentence, the inborn expression, which at sight gave
things names appropriate to their form and nature.”
And when we consider how necessary the use of language is to the
convenience, comfort, and progress of man, and that man had at once
conferred upon him a body “curiously and wonderfully made,” and a mind
capacious, active, strong, and penetrating, can we harbor the idea that
after his creation, God left him,--a perfect, full-grown being, the
noblest of his works, and the lord of nature,--without speech? Rather
must we not infer, with a distinguished writer, that “the same Divine
Author of the physical organs of speech imparted to man the knowledge
of their use and power”?
But speech carries thought from the mouth to the ear by sound, and then
perishes like the medium which conveyed it there. There needed to be,
therefore, a process to _preserve_ thought, by reducing it to material
signs on some enduring substance. So writing was given to the world.
And the wonderful discovery of alphabetical writing, how did it come
about? By chance? by human ingenuity? or through the “fatherly mystery
of the Creator inspiring it” in man? Says the learned Shackford, “That
men should immediately fall on such a project, to express sounds by
letters, and expose to sight all that may be said or thought in about
twenty characters variously placed, exceeds the highest notions we can
have of the capacities with which we are endowed.” How difficult to
submit our reason to the theories which have been argued of a _gradual_
construction of alphabetical letters! Is it reasonable to suppose, for
example, that the old Shemitish letter D was suggested by the word
_door_, or the letter H by the word _fence_, and the V by a _hook_ or
_nail_? Do we not find evidence, that alphabetical writing was divinely
revealed, in the tables of stone written by the finger of God and
given to Moses on the Mount? In those ten commandments so anciently
bestowed, all the Hebrew letters, with one exception, are found--every
guttural, labial, lingual, and dental is disclosed. Some quote the
Chinese as leading the way in imprinting language. But their writing
was hieroglyphical, they did not reach alphabetical writing, and they
use one hundred and twenty thousand characters to express thought.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account