Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of bothDoran, Dr. (John)
Philosophy
Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of both
Doran, Dr. (John)
Manners and customs
The English clergy do not appear to have estimated beards by Van
Helmont’s scale. One of the body, in the reign of Elizabeth, cherished
his beard as an incentive to righteousness. “He wore it,” he said,
“to remind him that no act of his life should be unworthy of the
gravity of his appearance.” This good gentleman’s beard assuredly did
not deserve what Shakspeare affirms some men’s _do_, namely, “not so
honourable a grave as to stuff a botcher’s cushion, or to be entombed
in an ass’s pack-saddle.” Henry VIII. on the other hand, would not
tolerate monitorism even from his own beard, and he accordingly and
characteristically cut it short. Perhaps this monarch wished also to have
it out of the way of petitioners; for stroking the beard, in sign of
supplication for mercy, was for thousands of years a recognized fashion,
as may be seen in the Classics, and in Shakspeare, _passim_. It will be
remembered that Hudibras stroked his own beard before he proceeded to
“honour the shadow” of the lady’s shoe-tie. This act has been editorially
declared to have been done as in sign of asking for her favour; from the
recollection, I suppose, of Thetis “palming” the chin of Jupiter; but I
think it was merely a piece of gallantry, “dressing” as it were, for the
occasion, as in Congreve’s ‘Way of the World,’ wherein it is said, “The
gentlemen wait but to comb, Madam, and will wait on you.” Formerly, no
gallant ascended to a lady’s boudoir without first combing his peruke at
the foot of the stairs, and assuring himself, by a glance at his pocket
mirror, that he was as well-looking a fop as ever wasted morning in
talking nonsense to a speaking and painted doll.
To pull another person’s beard, was to inflict on the wearer the most
degrading insult that could be thought of. When the Jew, who hated and
feared the living Cid Rui Dios, heard that the great Spaniard was dead,
he contrived to get into the room where the body lay, and he indulged
his revengeful spirit by contemptuously plucking at the beard. But the
“son of somebody” (the _hidalgo_) was plucked temporarily into life and
indignation by the outrage; and starting half up, endeavoured to get at
his sword,—an attempt which killed the Jew by the mere fright which it
caused.
To shave a Moslem’s beard was once a penalty as terrible as to a Chinese
the cutting off of his extended tail; and Christian princes have so
esteemed the appendage, that they have pawned the beard, or a portion
of it, for money lent, and redeemed the sacred pledge punctually at the
promised hour. They would have forfeited all claim to be honoured of men,
or rewarded of God, had they failed in their contract. In modern times
they pledge only their words; and as words are of less value than beards,
they are not so careful about the redemption thereof. That terribly
mendacious personage, the Czar Nicholas, has, at all events, made his
“parole de _gentleman_” to be synonymous with deliberate falsehood.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account