Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of bothDoran, Dr. (John)
Philosophy
Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of both
Doran, Dr. (John)
Manners and customs
After all, Justice was here, as usual, uncommonly blind; for the boxing
party, masked or not, was not more offensive against _bonos mores_ than
the Ranelagh parties, where powdered “bloods” percolated their dreadfully
luscious nonsense through the filter on the faces of the masked “belles.”
And besides, masking at holiday-time had long been a privilege of the
people. In ‘Vox Graculi’ (1623), above a century prior to the last date,
I find it stated of Twelfth Night—“On this night, much masking in the
Strand, Cheapside, Holborn, and Fleet-street.”
I have already noticed how our exceedingly precious grandmothers used to
resort to the theatres with covered faces instead of stopped-up ears.
The ears of the public did however rise angrily at last; the palled
appetite loathed the long-served food. A society was formed “for the
reformation of manners, for immoral words and expressions _contra bonos
mores_, uttered on the stage.” The society retained hired informers,
who sat in the pit, took down the naughty words and the names of the
speakers, and then entered a prosecution against the utterers. They were
driving a pretty trade, for the benefit of modesty and the suppression
of masks, when all at once Queen Anne, sipping her hollands, gently
bethought herself that these spies were flourishing by the abundance
of that which they feigned desire to put down; and indeed the fellows
were like some of our professional missionaries of the _pavé_, who steal
spoons from chop-houses, and have as many wives as Rugantino. The Queen
accordingly crushed the trading prosecutions by a “Nolle prosequi,” and
took the matter into her own hands. She issued a “royal command” for the
better regulation of the theatres, whereby she left to her Master of the
Revels “the special care that nothing be acted in either of the theatres
contrary to religion or good manners, upon pain of our high displeasure,
and of being silenced from further acting.”
Now, leaving to a Master of the Revels the care of suppressing revelry on
the stage, was very much like entrusting to Satan the suppression of sin.
However, so it was; but her Majesty tore the masks off herself, or rather
threatened to do so, as thus:—
“We do hereby strictly command that no person, of what quality soever,
presume to go behind the scenes, or come upon the stage, either before
or during the acting of any piece; that no woman be allowed or presume
to wear a vizard mask in either of the theatres; and that no persons
come into either house without paying the price established for their
respective places.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account