Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of bothDoran, Dr. (John)
Philosophy
Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of both
Doran, Dr. (John)
Manners and customs
Surely there is dignity in a subject treating even of toys that have
been in fashion for three thousand years, and have afforded amusement
to two-thirds of the human race. The subject was largely discussed in
France not many years since, by M. Charles Magnin, a gentleman who, in
love with his plaything, had recourse to every source of information, and
who brought away from all something worth knowing. M. Magnin shows that
the gravest of authors are at issue as to the origin of the puppet race.
Charles Nodier, however, traces it to the doll that lies in unconscious
felicity in the arms of youthful and precocious maturity. M. Magnin
maintains, on the other hand, that the puppet does not spring from the
hearth, but from the altar. The rude god whittled out of a gnarled bough
is, with him, the undoubted sire of the universe of dolls. The puppet
served for pious, before it was suited to domestic, purposes; and it
excited awe long before it won laughter or excited admiration. It lived
in a wood, and ruled savages. As civilization advanced, it changed its
habits, form, and features; and, ceasing to affright man, undertook the
happier task of amusing him.
Such is the legendary record of puppets. We must turn over the graphic
pages of the ‘Father of History,’ to find the first authentic mention
of their employment. The guests at an Egyptian feast, when they grew
hilarious, were called back to sober propriety by the exhibition of
a little skeleton, and the admonition to reflect upon the lesson it
conveyed. The British Museum possesses many of these figures, as well as
others which appear to be toys that have been buried with their loved
little owners. There is some uncertainty on this point, however; for
it is known that on diseased persons it was the custom to place little
figures, supposed to represent the deity which had particular influence
over the part whereon the image was laid. I believe that the liver
was the only portion of the body that had not its peculiar divinity.
That obstinate organ has always defied gods and men. “In jecore nigro
nascuntur domini;” and over these even the Egyptian Pantheon availed
nothing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account