Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of bothDoran, Dr. (John)
Philosophy
Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of both
Doran, Dr. (John)
Manners and customs
Under the mystic number “nine,” I come to that William Archbishop of
York, who was the nephew of Stephen King of England, and whom old St.
Bernard belaboured with as many hard words as ever Sir Richard Birnie
hurled, on a Monday morning, on ex-inebriated tailors captured on the
preceding Saturday night. I do not believe a word of what the irate St.
Bernard says against St. William, whom he accuses of the most horrible
crimes. The slightest charge in the bill of indictment drawn up by him,
whom Hurden calls a wicked old impostor, is love of good living. St.
William, like honest Archiepiscopus Wilfred, had a tender inclination for
roast goose! Oh, benedicte Gulielme! may you have found the bird ever as
your inclination,—tender! The sacred goose is an appanage of the tailors,
and it dates from that jovial St. William whom St. Bernard hated as
cordially as though the former had made the latter’s hair-shirt too tight
to comfortably breathe in after supper.
Our tenth example is the St. William who was bishop of St. Brieux, in
Brittany, who often pawned his robes to purchase corn for the poor.
Here we see whence the society of tailors borrow their authority for
depositing pledges, in order to purchase distillations from corn, and for
the poor also,—their poor selves. This is highly satisfactory.
There was one more William, namely, he who, English by birth, was the
introducer of Christianity into Denmark, and who was of such good repute
when living that he was buried in the mausoleum of the Danish kings, at
Roeskild, after death. It was remarked of him that when he was reproving
“drunken Denmark,” he invariably held his pastoral staff as though he
were taking measure, as he probably was of the royal bad habits; and
perhaps on this account he has come in for a share of the patronage
exercised over the guild whose members take measure of men.
And now let it be observed, that although I have mentioned eleven
Williams, there are only _nine_ of them who really rank among the
canonized saints. Is not _that_ suggestive? The fraternity, of whom it
takes nine members to make a man, have naturally supposed that it would
take nine saints to make one patron. It is clear, then, that it is not
to _one_ William, but to _nine_ combined, that the guild address, or did
in olden times address, their vows and acknowledgments; and exactly for
the reason that there are nine Saint Williams have the English tailors
chosen them, in a mass, for their one consolidated patron. _Quod erat
demonstrandum!_
And now, having seen how the tailors took their patron, let us consider
them generally. There have been many of note, either of themselves or in
their sons. Church, bar, army, navy, poetry, and the stage,—they have by
turns excelled in all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account