Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of bothDoran, Dr. (John)
Philosophy
Habits and men, with remnants of record touching the makers of both
Doran, Dr. (John)
Manners and customs
“He lived a poet in this town
(If we may term our modern writers poets),
Sharp-witted, bitter-tongued, his pen of steel.
His ink was temper’d with the biting juice,
And extracts of the bitterest weeds that grew.
He never wrote but when the elements
Of fire and water tilted in his brain.”
HEYWOOD: _Fair Maid of the Exchange_.
Among the tailors who have been authors, Paul Whitehead takes a very
respectable rank; which is more, I am sorry to say, than he does among
men. The career of the two Whiteheads has a moral in it. William, the
son of a Cambridge baker, was, like Paul, the tailor’s son, a most
successful tuft-hunter; but then he hunted chiefly after patricians of
principle,—of good principle. William was a gentle lad; he walked through
the university of his native city with quiet credit, and passed into
Lord Grey’s family as private tutor; where he taught mildly, and wrote
classical tragedies of so soporific a nature, that the reading of them
might safely be recommended to the sleepless by hypnologists. William
the baker was a highly respectable and never-too-soon-to-be-forgotten
individual.
It is otherwise with roystering Paul the tailor. Chapel-yard, Holborn,
was the cradle (in 1709) of this boisterous and biting poet. His father
would have been content to see him take measures to follow his example;
but as Hervagault, the first pseudo-Dauphin, quitted his father’s board
to make assault upon the throne of Capet, so Paul, backed by his friends,
aimed at the realm of rhyme, and would wear his father’s coats, but would
not make them. His sire apprenticed him to a mercer; the ambitious son
went and entered himself at the Temple.
Paul was one of those daring wits whom profane men most admire; and as
the young tailor’s style was one which had respect for neither Olympus
nor the mortals, he became a laureate, like William the Baker, but not,
like him, poet-laureate to the King.
Paul of Castle-yard was laureate to the “Bucks.” He was a member of the
most reprobate clubs of the day. He was a member of the brotherhood of
Medenham Abbey,—not of the pious and pot-heaving Cistercians, who gurgled
their throats with good old wine, but of the God-denying and profligate
crew that had Sir Francis Dashwood for their prior. Paul was the Parny
of this and similar sets; and when his patrons required a lay against
loyalty, a rhyme against royalty, a metrical kick at kings, songs against
statesmen, or diatribes against dunces, the Muse of the tailor’s clever
boy was ever ready for the nonce. For clever he was, despite the abuse
of Churchill—himself very far from immaculate. If Paul was a reprobate,
Churchill was that, and a parson to boot,—two professions which should
never be united in one and the same individual. And yet Churchill wrote—
“May I (can worse disgrace on manhood fall?)
Be born a Whitehead, and baptized a Paul!”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account