"Kindly let Us have your opinion of this statement:--_A remarkable
petition has been prepared for presentation to Parliament. The
petitioners are the Roman Catholic laity resident in England; and they
pray Parliament to set up some control over Roman Catholic moneys and
interests. It is pointed out that the total capital invested in the
Roman Catholic clergy in the United Kingdom must amount to nearly
£50,000,000. It is alleged that no account is afforded by the Roman
Catholic bishops of the management or disbursements of such property
and moneys. And the petitioners also call attention to gross injustices
which are of daily occurrence._"
"That emanated from a priest of my archdiocese, Holiness. It was
a terrible scandal: but we were successful in preventing it from
spreading."
"Then there was such a petition? At first, We were prepared to ascribe
it to the imagination of one of Sir Notyet Apeer's young men. And
really were there many supporters of the petition?"
"Unfortunately, yes."
"Then you have rebellion within the camp. And was there any ground for
these statements?"
"There was no ground whatever for the insinuation that we habitually
misuse our trusteeship. The man had a grievance. His agitation was
merely a means to compel us to solace him. He trusted, by making
himself unpleasant to us, to make us pleasant to him. So he attacked
our financial arrangements. It was a wicked stroke: for, you know, Holy
Father, that we cannot be expected to account to any Tom-Dick-and-Harry
for bequests and endowments which we administer."
"Your accounts are properly audited, no doubt?"
"To a great extent, yes."
"But not invariably? You trust much to the honesty and the financial
ability of individual clerks? We do not presume for a moment that there
is any systematic malversation of trust. You have had a lesson on that
subject."
"Lesson?"
"Yes: in 1886: after the notorious Carvale Case, when the infatuated
imbecility of the Gaelic and Pictish bishops was shewn to render
them undesirable as trustees, the clergy simply dare not stray into
illegal paths. Oh no. But are the clergy actually capable of financial
administration?"
"As capable, I suppose, as other men."
"Priests are not 'as other men.' However, We take it that you all
believe yourselves to have acted conscientiously. We also take it
that, in view of the power and influence which the position of trustee
affords, your clergy eagerly become trustees and are unwilling to
submit to supervision or to criticism. That is quite human. We entirely
disapprove of it."
"But what would your Holiness have?"
"We cannot say it in one sentence. You must collect Our mind from
Our conduct as well as from our words. We entirely disapprove of the
clergy competing for or using any secular power or dominance whatever,
especially such power as inheres in the command of money. The clergy
are ministers--ministers--not masters. And as to the other charge--'the
gross injustices which are of daily occurrence'?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account