Natural history -- England -- Hampshire; Natural history -- Outdoor books
If the insects named as our best are rare and local, or at all events
not common, what shall we say of our cicada? Can we call him a
singer at all? or if he be not silent, as some think, will he ever be
more to us than a figure and descriptive passage in a book--a mere
cicada of the mind? He is the most local, or has the most limited
range, of all, being seldom found out of the New Forest district. He
was discovered there about seventy years ago, and Curtis, who gave
him the proud name of _Cicada anglica_, expressed the opinion that he
had no song. And many others have thought so too, because they have
been unable to hear him. Others, from Kirby and Spence to our time,
have been of a contrary opinion. So the matter stands. A. H.
Swinton, in his work on _Insect Variety and Propagation_, 1885,
relates that he tried in vain to hear _Cicada anglica_ before going
to France and Italy to make a study of the cicada music; and he
writes:
In northern England their woodland melody has not yet fallen on
the ear of the entomologist, but it must not therefore be
inferred that these musicians are wholly absent, for among the
rich and bounteous southern fauna of Hampshire and Surrey we
still retain one outlying waif of the cigales ... _Cicada
anglica_, seemingly the _montana_ of Scopoli, if not _Hamatodes
in proprid persona_. The male, usually beaten in June from
blossoming hawthorn in the New Forest, is provided with
instruments of music, and the female, more terrestrial, is often
observed wandering with a whit-ring sound among bracken wastes,
where she is thought to deposit her ova.
{136}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account