Hans Holbein the Younger, Volume 2 (of 2)Chamberlain, Arthur B. (Arthur Bensley)
History
Hans Holbein the Younger, Volume 2 (of 2)
Chamberlain, Arthur B. (Arthur Bensley)
Holbein, Hans, 1497-1543 -- Criticism and interpretation; Painters -- Germany -- Biography
There is no doubt that Holbein painted the portrait immediately after
his return from Brussels, although some writers have suggested that it
is a year or so later in date than 1538. This conclusion is based
largely on the supposition that Holbein’s visit to High Burgundy later
in the same year was for the purpose of obtaining further sittings from
the Duchess; but this is an error, as will be shown in the next chapter.
The portrait was painted for Henry, and would naturally be done at once,
before the negotiations for the marriage were broken off, and it
remained in his collection throughout his life. Holbein was out of
England more often and for a longer period in 1538 than has been
generally supposed. In addition to at least one other continental
journey on the King’s service, he was absent from about the middle of
August until nearly Christmas, and thus everything indicates that this
important panel was painted in April or May.
Another argument, advanced by Sir George Scharf in favour of the
contention that it was painted some time after 1538, is that the name
and titles of the lady written on the fictitious piece of paper attached
to the dark background near to her left shoulder, by four dabs of
sealing-wax, designate her “Duchess of Lorraine.” This inscription Sir
George reads as: “Christine, Daughter to Christierne K. of Deñarke, and
Dutchess of Lotragne and heretofore (?) Dutches of Milan.” The writing,
however, is much rubbed, and is by no means easy to decipher; thus the
word which Sir George read as “heretofore,” Mr. Wornum considered to be
“hered” (hereditary). “This,” Sir George goes on to say, “would, if the
writing be contemporary with the picture, bring the date to 1541, the
year of her second marriage to Francis, Duke of Lorraine and Barr. The
style of writing on the paper may perhaps raise some question, and may
possibly be found to belong to the period of James I, when through his
Queen and the occasional presence of Christian IV in England, a
considerable interest was felt in matters connected with Denmark.”[271]
Footnote 271:
_Archæologia_, xl. p. 109. The date of her marriage to Lorraine
appears to have been 1540.
The inscription as it now is was probably painted over an earlier one
from Holbein’s brush, for it is too badly done to be original; but there
is no need to place it as late as Sir George suggests, for the Lumley
inventory speaks of her as the Duchess of Lorraine, so that the
alteration may have been due to Lord Lumley or his father-in-law. It is
even possible that Holbein may have placed no title of any kind on the
picture, but that the whole label was added by some other painter
employed for the purpose by the owner of Nonsuch.
In spite of Henry’s admiration for the picture, the proposed match came
to nothing, though for some time Hutton continued to write letters in
her praises. Thus, on the 1st April 1538, he wrote to the King:
[Sidenote: FAILURE OF MARRIAGE NEGOTIATIONS]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account