Hans Holbein the Younger, Volume 2 (of 2)Chamberlain, Arthur B. (Arthur Bensley)
History
Hans Holbein the Younger, Volume 2 (of 2)
Chamberlain, Arthur B. (Arthur Bensley)
Holbein, Hans, 1497-1543 -- Criticism and interpretation; Painters -- Germany -- Biography
In the first instance, Henry’s inclinations were very strongly set upon
Marie of Lorraine, the eldest daughter of Claude, Duke of Guise, and the
young widow of Charles d’Orléans, Duke of Longueville, although she had
been promised to James V of Scotland before Jane Seymour’s death. Henry
knew quite well that this arrangement had been made, but he would not
listen to the names of other ladies which were suggested to him, and
maintained with great pertinacity to Castillon that the match with
Scotland had not yet been settled, and that Madame de Longueville had
not herself agreed to it. “He is so amorous of Madame de Longueville,”
wrote Castillon to Francis, on December 30, 1537, “that he cannot
refrain from coming back upon it.” “I asked him,” he goes on, “who
caused him to be more inclined to her than to others, and he said Wallop
was so loud in her praises that nothing could exceed them. Moreover, he
said that he was big in person, and had need of a big wife—that your
daughter was too young for him, and as to Madame de Vendosme, he would
not take the King of Scots’ leavings!”[289]
Footnote 289:
_C.L.P._, vol. xii. pt. ii. 1285.
Either in December 1537 or early in the following January, Henry sent
over Peter Mewtas, of the Privy Chamber, to see the Duchess secretly,
and to find out from her whether she considered herself bound to James;
and as a result of this mission he appears to have convinced himself
that, whatever Francis I might have arranged, the lady herself and her
parents were attracted by his offer, considering an alliance with so
powerful a sovereign to be preferred to one with the “beggarly and
stupid King of Scots,” as Henry termed his nephew to Castillon. There
was a political attraction, also, about the proposal, from Henry’s point
of view, for if he succeeded in taking James’s bride from him it would
tend to alienate the Scots from France.
Formal articles of marriage, however, between the lady and James V were
drawn up in January; but in spite of this Henry stuck to his point, and
about the 1st of February Peter Mewtas was again despatched by Cromwell
to find out definitely if she were still free, and also to obtain her
portrait. The instructions given him need not be quoted here. They
concluded by saying that if he perceived any towardness in the lady, he
was, if possible, to get and bring with him “her picture truly made and
like unto her.”[290]
Footnote 290:
_C.L.P._, vol. xiii. pt. i. 203. _St. P._, viii. 10.
[Sidenote: PIERRE QUESNEL AND HIS SONS]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account