Hans Holbein the Younger, Volume 2 (of 2)Chamberlain, Arthur B. (Arthur Bensley)
History
Hans Holbein the Younger, Volume 2 (of 2)
Chamberlain, Arthur B. (Arthur Bensley)
Holbein, Hans, 1497-1543 -- Criticism and interpretation; Painters -- Germany -- Biography
Henry, however, in his own declaration, never refers to a portrait. He
entered into the marriage, he said, “because I heard so much both of her
excellent beauty and virtuous conditions.” In addition, he told Sir
Anthony Browne, “I see nothing in this woman as men report of her, and I
mervail that wise men would make such report as they have done.” He also
told Cromwell, in reply to his question as to how he liked the lady,
“Nothing so well as she was spoken of; if I had known as much before as
I know now, she should never have come into the realm. But what remedy?”
After all, however, the praises of her sent home by Henry’s ambassadors
were not very hearty ones. In Hutton’s letter from Brussels, already
quoted,[385] written shortly after Jane Seymour’s death, in answer to a
request that he would search for a possible bride for the King at the
Court of the Regent, he reported, among other princesses, that “the
Dewke of Clevis hathe a daughter, but I here no great preas neyther of
hir personage nor beawtie.” Wootton’s account, given above, is a
remarkably cautious one, and lays most stress on Anne’s domestic
virtues. He had also complained that he had found it impossible to judge
of the personal appearance of the two ladies on account of the ugly
head-dresses they wore.
Footnote 385:
See p. 116.
Had the fault been Holbein’s, he would, no doubt, have fallen under the
King’s displeasure. At the least his appointment would have been taken
from him, even if he had not been forced to leave England; but the
contrary was the case. In September, after his return from Cleves, he
received, for a second time, a whole year’s salary in advance. This was,
of course, before the King had seen the original of the portrait; but,
strangely enough, if the accounts are to be believed, in addition to
this year’s advance, Holbein continued to receive his salary every
quarter day for the next year, so that he was paid twice over.[386] It
is thus very evident that the painter suffered no disgrace or lack of
employment or patronage, so that the legend must be abandoned.
Footnote 386:
See p. 190.
[Sidenote: PORTRAIT OF ANNE OF CLEVES]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account