Hans Holbein the Younger, Volume 2 (of 2)Chamberlain, Arthur B. (Arthur Bensley)
History
Hans Holbein the Younger, Volume 2 (of 2)
Chamberlain, Arthur B. (Arthur Bensley)
Holbein, Hans, 1497-1543 -- Criticism and interpretation; Painters -- Germany -- Biography
Hollar. It is highly improbable, too, that after he had been so
elaborately painted Dinteville would have sat again for his portrait a
few years later, so that, all things considered, this attribution can
only be accepted with caution. There is, however, an undoubted portrait
of Dinteville at Chantilly, forming part of the collection of drawings
of the ladies and gentlemen of the Court of Francis I, by Jean Clouet
and his school, which was formerly at Castle Howard. This portrait was
identified by Miss Hervey in 1904.[85] The likeness is very marked,
though the drawing lacks the strength and fine draughtsmanship to be
found in similar portrait-studies by Holbein, and it appears to have
been done within a few years of the picture itself.
Footnote 83:
Woltmann, 345; Wornum, i. 12; Holmes, i. 52; engraved by Hollar, 1649
(Parthey, 1547). Reproduced by Miss Hervey, p. 110; Ganz, _Hdz. von H.
H. dem Jüng._, No. 33; Mantz, p. 177. Hollar’s engraving reproduced by
Ganz, _Holbein_, p. 199 (i.).
Footnote 84:
The drawing was conjectured at one time to represent Charles Brandon,
Duke of Suffolk, and it has also been suggested that it is a likeness
of Edward Stafford, Duke of Buckingham. It is described on p. 257.
Footnote 85:
_Burlington Magazine_, vol. v. No. xvi. (July 1904), where the drawing
is reproduced.
[Sidenote: “THE COURT OF FRANCIS II”]
The picture was taken back to France by Dinteville, and remained at
Polisy until the middle of the seventeenth century. By the marriage, in
1562, of Dinteville’s niece, Claude, with François de Cazillac, Baron de
Cessac, the family estates, and with them the picture, passed into the
possession of the latter house, a distinguished family in the south of
France. In 1654 a later François de Cazillac sold Polisy, and
permanently removed to the Château of Milhars in Languedoc, his chief
residence. From the second document quoted above we learn that De Cessac
removed the picture to his town house in Paris in 1653. This house was
in the Rue du Four, St. Germain des Prez, behind the house known as
Chapeaufort, in the parish of St. Sulpice.[86] From 1653 onwards there
is no actual evidence as to the whereabouts of the picture until it
turned up one hundred and twenty years later in the Beaujon sale in
Paris in 1787. During his researches into its past history Mr. W. F.
Dickes discovered this sale-catalogue in the Cabinet des Estampes in
Paris.[87] Nicolas Beaujon, a rich financier and collector of pictures
and objects of art, died without heirs in 1786, leaving all his money to
charities. His pictures were sold in the following spring, and among
them were two attributed to Holbein. These two works were not,
apparently, part of Beaujon’s collection, but were put into the sale by
some other person.[88] The first, which, according to the
sale-catalogue, represented the Court of Francis II, has recently come
to light again;[89] the second was the “Ambassadors” picture. The two
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account