Domestic fiction; Education -- Fiction; England -- Fiction; Political fiction; Social problems -- Fiction; Utilitarianism -- Fiction
By the place where Rachael lived, though it was not in his way; by the
red brick streets; by the great silent factories, not trembling yet; by
the railway, where the danger-lights were waning in the strengthening
day; by the railway’s crazy neighbourhood, half pulled down and half
built up; by scattered red brick villas, where the besmoked evergreens
were sprinkled with a dirty powder, like untidy snuff-takers; by
coal-dust paths and many varieties of ugliness; Stephen got to the top of
the hill, and looked back.
Day was shining radiantly upon the town then, and the bells were going
for the morning work. Domestic fires were not yet lighted, and the high
chimneys had the sky to themselves. Puffing out their poisonous volumes,
they would not be long in hiding it; but, for half an hour, some of the
many windows were golden, which showed the Coketown people a sun
eternally in eclipse, through a medium of smoked glass.
So strange to turn from the chimneys to the birds. So strange, to have
the road-dust on his feet instead of the coal-grit. So strange to have
lived to his time of life, and yet to be beginning like a boy this summer
morning! With these musings in his mind, and his bundle under his arm,
Stephen took his attentive face along the high road. And the trees
arched over him, whispering that he left a true and loving heart behind.
CHAPTER VII
GUNPOWDER
MR. JAMES HARTHOUSE, ‘going in’ for his adopted party, soon began to
score. With the aid of a little more coaching for the political sages, a
little more genteel listlessness for the general society, and a tolerable
management of the assumed honesty in dishonesty, most effective and most
patronized of the polite deadly sins, he speedily came to be considered
of much promise. The not being troubled with earnestness was a grand
point in his favour, enabling him to take to the hard Fact fellows with
as good a grace as if he had been born one of the tribe, and to throw all
other tribes overboard, as conscious hypocrites.
‘Whom none of us believe, my dear Mrs. Bounderby, and who do not believe
themselves. The only difference between us and the professors of virtue
or benevolence, or philanthropy—never mind the name—is, that we know it
is all meaningless, and say so; while they know it equally and will never
say so.’
Why should she be shocked or warned by this reiteration? It was not so
unlike her father’s principles, and her early training, that it need
startle her. Where was the great difference between the two schools,
when each chained her down to material realities, and inspired her with
no faith in anything else? What was there in her soul for James
Harthouse to destroy, which Thomas Gradgrind had nurtured there in its
state of innocence!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account