Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. IX.—February, 1851.—Vol. II.Various
General
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. IX.—February, 1851.—Vol. II.
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
when Britain was but a hunting-field for Danish and Saxon pirates; and
may still exist when Britain shall have become as Tyre and Carthage.
GREAT BRITAIN.
The opening of Parliament is fixed to take place on the third of
February; in the meanwhile Government will have leisure to decide upon
its course with respect to the Catholic excitement, which has continued
to rage with an intensity out of all proportion to the cause which has
excited it. The simple act of appointing bishops to the various
dioceses, has been construed into an arrogant encroachment upon the
prerogatives of the Crown, and an attack upon the liberties and
independence of the people. The surprise of Hannibal, when lying before
the walls of Rome in hourly expectation of the surrender of the city,
could not have been greater at learning that an army had just been
dispatched for foreign conquest, and the very spot where he was encamped
sold for a high price at public auction, than that of the English at the
news that the sovereign of a petty principality, who had been driven
from his dominions by his own subjects, and was brought back and
sustained only by foreign arms, should coolly map out their country
among his own dependents. The papers are filled with remonstrances,
addresses, petitions, speeches, and protests from every body to every
body. Twenty-six archbishops and bishops, comprising the whole episcopal
bench, with two exceptions, united in a solemn protest to the Queen
against this treatment of England as a heathen country, and the
assumption of ecclesiastical dominion by the Pope. The Bishop of Exeter,
having his hands rid of the Gorham difficulty, refused to sign this
document, and prepared for presentation to her Majesty an address of his
own, of portentous length, couched in that cumbrous phraseology affected
by ecclesiastical writers. This was returned to the author by the
Secretary of State, with the very curt announcement that it was not a
document which he could properly lay before her Majesty. Addresses were
presented on one day from the authorities of London, and from the
Universities of Oxford and Cambridge. That from Oxford was read by the
Duke of Wellington, that from Cambridge by Prince Albert, as the
Chancellors of the respective universities. The addresses expressed
attachment to the royal person and the principles of the Reformation;
and indignation at the Papal aggressions upon the royal supremacy; with
earnest petitions that prompt measures might be taken to repress all
foreign encroachments upon the rights of the Crown and the independence
of the people. The London address contained, moreover, significant hints
at innovations, principles, and practices nearly allied to those of
Rome, sanctioned by some of the clergy, and expressed a desire for the
preservation and purity of the Protestant faith. The replies of the
Queen, having of course been prepared beforehand by the Ministry, are of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account