Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. XXIII.—April, 1852.—Vol. IV.: NoneVarious
General
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. XXIII.—April, 1852.—Vol. IV.: None
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
On the 9th, Lord John Russell introduced his new Reform Bill. Its
provisions may be very briefly stated. The £10 franchise was to be
reduced to £5; the £50 county franchise gives way to one of £20; that of
copyholders and long leaseholders is to be reduced from £10 to £5; and a
new class of voters is to be created out of those who, resident in
either county or borough, pay direct taxes to the amount of 40
shillings. In 67 boroughs additions are proposed to the electoral
boundaries; the property qualification is to be abolished, and the oaths
of members to be put in such a form as to create no invidious
distinctions. A member taking office under the crown vacates his seat;
but if he merely changes it, he may retain his representative capacity.
The Premier made a speech upon the subject, over an hour in length, and
remarkably free from feeling of any sort. The main objections urged to
the bill are that it does not concede the ballot, that it does not
remedy the evils of unequal representation, and that the changes it does
make in the existing law are of very little importance. Notice has been
given of an intention to move amendments to the bill which would remedy
these defects.----On the 19th, Lord Naas proposed a resolution severely
censuring the Earl of Clarendon's employment of the _World_ newspaper to
support the government, as being "of a nature to weaken the authority of
the executive, and to reflect discredit on the administration of public
affairs." The Earl was defended warmly by Lords Russell and Palmerston,
both of whom urged that, irregular as the proceeding might have been, it
was of trifling consequence compared with his lordship's eminent
services to the country. The resolution was rejected 229 to 137.----On
the 16th, Lord John Russell introduced a bill for the establishment of a
local militia force. He gave a sketch of the recent history of the
military organization of England, and set forth the reasons which, in
his judgment, rendered it important that some more effectual provision
should be made for the defense of the country against possible
hostilities. The general provisions of the bill were that persons of the
age of 20 and 21 years should be subject to being balloted for as
militia men--that one-fifth of the whole number should be chosen--and
that they should be drilled for 14 or 28 days each year. The entire
force thus raised, he thought, would be about 70,000 the first year,
100,000 the second, and 130,000 after that; the forces could not be
taken out of their own counties, without their consent, except in case
of invasion or danger. The subject was very slightly discussed at that
time, but came up again on the 20th, when Lord John Russell again spoke
in support of the bill. Lord Palmerston expressed his entire concurrence
in the principle of the bill, but moved as an amendment, to strike out
the word _local_ from the title, in order to make the title correspond
with the character of the bill itself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account