Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. XXVII, August 1852, Vol. VVarious
History
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, No. XXVII, August 1852, Vol. V
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
You sometimes find in the same family, children of the same parents,
who in all respects present the most striking contrast. They not
only seem to be of different parentage, but of different races;
unlike in physical conformation, in complexion, in features, in
temperament, and in moral and intellectual qualities. They are
sometimes to be found diametrically opposed to each other in tastes,
pursuits, habits, and sympathies, though brought up under the same
parental eye, subject to the same circumstances and conditions, and
educated by the same teachers. Indeed, education does comparatively
little toward the formation of character--that is to say, in the
determination of the _individuality_ of character. It merely brings
out, or _e-duces_ that character, the germs of which are born in us,
and only want proper sunning, and warmth, and geniality, to bring
them to maturity.
You could scarcely have imagined that Elizabeth and Jane Byfield
were in any way related to each other. They had not a feature in
common. The one was a brilliant beauty, the other was plain in the
extreme. Elizabeth had a dazzling complexion, bright, speaking eyes,
an oval face, finely turned nose and chin, a mouth as pouting as if
"a bee had stung it newly;" she was tall and lithe; taper, yet
rounded--in short, she was a regular beauty, the belle of her
neighborhood, pursued by admirers, besonneted by poetasters,
serenaded by musical amateurs, toasted by spirit-loving old fogy
bachelors, and last, but not least, she was the subject of many a
tit-bit piece of scandal among her young lady rivals in the
country-town of Barkstone.
As for her sister Jane, with her demure, old-maidish air, her little
dumpy, thick-set figure, her _retroussé_ nose, and dingy features,
nobody bestowed a thought upon her. She had no rival, she was no
one's competitor, she offended nobody's sense of individual prowess
in grace or charms, by _her_ assumptions. Not at all. "That horrid
little fright, Jane Byfield," as some of her stylish acquaintances
would speak of her, behind her back, stood in no young lady's way.
She was very much of a house-bird, was Jane. In the evenings, while
her sister was dashing off some brilliant bravura in the
drawing-room, Jane would be seated in a corner, talking to some
person older than herself--or, perhaps you might find her in the
little back parlor, knitting or mending stockings. Not that she was
without a spice of fun in her; for, among children, she romped like
one of themselves; indeed, she was a general favorite with those who
were much younger as well as much older than herself. Yet, among
those of her own age, she never excited any admiration, except for
her dutifulness--though that, you know, is a very dull sort of
thing. Certainly, she never excited any young lady's envy, or
attracted any young gentleman's homage, like her more highly favored
sister. Indeed, by a kind of general consent, she was set down for
"a regular old maid."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account