Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. 1. No 1, June 1850Various
General
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. 1. No 1, June 1850
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
The salts of lime and magnesia communicate to water the quality termed
_hardness_, a property which every one understands, but which it would
be very difficult to describe. By far the most common giver of hardness
is chalk, or, as chemists term it, carbonate of lime; a substance not
soluble in pure water, but readily so in water containing carbonic acid.
Rain water always contains this acid, and is, therefore, a solvent for
the chalk disseminated in the different geological formations through
which it percolates. Gypsum, familiarly known as plaster of Paris, and
termed sulphate of lime by chemists, is also extensively diffused in
rocks, and being itself soluble in water, becomes a very common
hardening ingredient, though not of such frequent occurrence as chalk.
Any earthy salt, such as chalk or gypsum, decomposes soap, and prevents
its action as a detergent. Soap consists of an oily acid combined
generally with soda. Now, when this is added to water containing lime,
that earth unites with the oily acid, forming an insoluble soap, of no
use as a detergent; this insoluble lime-soap is the curd which appears
in hard water during washing with soap. Hard water is of no use as a
cleanser, until all the lime has been removed by uniting with the oily
acid of the soap. Every hundred gallons of Thames water destroy in this
way thirty ounces of soap before becoming a detergent. But as this is an
enormous waste, the dwellers in towns, supplied with hard water, resort
to other methods of washing, so as to economize soap. If our readers in
London observe their habits in washing, they will perceive that the
principal quantity of the water is used by them not as a cleanser, but
merely for the purposes of rinsing off the very sparing amount employed
for detergent purposes. In London, we do not wash ourselves _in_ but
_out_ of the basin. A small quantity of water is taken on the hands and
saturated with soap so as to form a lather; the ablution is now made
with this quantity, and the water in the basin is only used to rinse it
off. The process of washing with soft water is entirely different, the
whole quantity being applied as a detergent. To illustrate this
difference an experiment may be made, by washing the hands alternately
in rain and then in hard water, such as that supplied to London; and the
value of the soft water for the purposes of washing will be at once
recognized. Even without soap, the soft water moistens the hand, while
hard water flows off, just as if the skin had been smeared with oil.
Now, although the soap may be economized in personal ablution by the
uncomfortable method here described, it is impossible to obtain this
economy in the washing of linen. In this case, the whole of the water
must be saturated with soap before it is available. Soda is, to a
certain extent, substituted with a view to economy, as much as £30,000
worth of soda being annually used in the metropolis to compensate for
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account