Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. 1. No 1, June 1850Various
General
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. 1. No 1, June 1850
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
Perhaps no falsehood has been more frequently repeated, than that men of
genius are less fortunate and less virtuous than other men; but the
obvious truth, that they who attempt little are less liable to failure
than they who attempt much, will account for the proverbial good luck of
fools. In our estimate of the sorrows and failings of literary men, we
forget that sorrow is the common lot; we forget, too, that the
misfortunes and the errors of men of genius are recorded; and that,
although their virtues may be utterly forgotten, their minutest faults
will be sure to find zealous historians. And this is as it should be.
Let the dead instruct us. But slanderers blame, in individuals, what
belongs to the species. "We women," says Clytemnestra in Eschylus, when
meditating the murder of her husband, and in reply to an attendant who
was praising the gentleness of the sex, "We women are--what we are." So
is it with us all. Then let every fault of men of genius be known; but
let not hypocrisy come with a sponge, and wipe away their virtues.
Of the misfortunes of Cowper we have all heard, and certainly he was
unfortunate, for he was liable to fits of insanity. But it might be said
of him, that he was tended through life by weeping angels. Warm-hearted
friends watched and guarded him with intense and unwearied solicitude;
the kindest hearted of the softer sex, the best of the best, seems to
have been born only to anticipate his wants. A glance at the world, will
show us that his fate, though sad, was not saddest; for how many madmen
are there, and how many men still more unfortunate than madmen, who have
no living-creature to aid, or soothe, or pity them! Think of
Milton--"blind among enemies!"
But the saddest incident in the life of Cowper remains to be told. In
his latter days, he was pensioned by the crown--a misfortune which I can
forgive to him, but not to destiny. It is consoling to think, that he
was not long conscious of his degradation after the cruel kindness was
inflicted on him. But why did not his friends, if weary of sustaining
their kinsman stricken by the arrows of the Almighty, suffer him to
perish in a _beggars'_ mad-house? Would he had died in a ditch rather
than this shadow had darkened over his grave! Burns was more fortunate
in his death than Cowper: he lived self-supported to the end. Glorious
hearted Burns! Noble, but unfortunate Cowper!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account