Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. III, No. XVII, October 1851Various
History
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. III, No. XVII, October 1851
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
Dueling has fallen into desuetude, and very properly. Times have changed
marvelously. Fifty years ago, gentlemen by descent, by property, or by
profession, were only _esquired;_ now, if you _mistered_ an attorney's
clerk, the letter would be sent repudiated to the dead office. To him
only who was entitled to bear arms, an appeal to arms was allowed; and
had a man in trade, though worth a plum, in those days presumed to send
a message to a gentleman not in trade, nor worth a penny, the odds would
be considerable that the bearer of the cartel would have been
horsewhipped on the spot. Even liberty to share in certain amusements
was considered great condescension on the part of the aristocracy to men
who had founded their own fortunes, and accidental meetings at the
cover-side were never supposed to warrant aught beyond a field
acquaintance. A brutal, but striking anecdote which marked this then
prevailing feeling of exclusiveness, is told of the too-celebrated
George Robert Fitzgerald. One hunting day, when drawing a fox cover, he
observed a well-mounted and smartly-dressed young man join the company;
and on inquiring his name from the whipper, was informed that the
stranger was a neighboring apothecary.
"An apothecary!" exclaimed the master of hounds. "By Heaven! men's
impudence every day becomes more audacious! Why, it would not surprise
me after this, that an attorney should join our meeting next. Come, it
is time that this dealer in drugs should be taught that fox-hunting is a
trade practiced only by gentlemen;" and riding up to the unoffending
dabbler in Galenicals, he savagely flogged him off the field.
That dueling has been employed too frequently for bad purposes, by brave
men--and for bloody ones, by blackguards, has never been denied. The
page of history, in the fatal meeting between Buckingham and Shrewsbury,
strikingly exemplifies the former assertion. For the seduction of his
wife--Buckingham, by the way, had seduced his _own_--the injured earl
demanded, and obtained satisfaction. In accordance with the barbarous
custom of the times, the seconds--two on either side--engaged; on the
duke's side, Jenkins was left dead; on the earl's, Sir John Talbot was
severely wounded. Buckingham, however, received no hurt beyond a
scratch, and ran his antagonist through the body, thus adding murder to
seduction. The fair frail one was worthy of the ducal ruffian she had
attached herself to. Disguised as a page, from a neighboring coppice she
watched the combat, and slept with the murderer of her husband the same
night, although the shirt he wore bore bloody evidence of the foul
assassination he had just committed. It is reported that the last hours
of the adulteress were miserable, and the felon blow that relieved the
world of such an unscrupulous villain as the duke, in our poor thinking,
was nothing beyond simple retribution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account