Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. III, No. XVII, October 1851 — John Shaqi
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. III, No. XVII, October 1851Various
History
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. III, No. XVII, October 1851
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
I have already hinted that my vocation as a teacher of English
introduced me to a new order of French humanity. Among the various
pupils who sought my cheap assistance in the promotion of their studies
was one Maubert, a young fellow of four or five and twenty, who was
contemplating a removal to London in the exercise of his profession,
which was neither more nor less than that of a gambler. He had a
relative in one of the hells at St. James's, who had offered him a
lucrative engagement so soon as he was sufficiently master of English to
be enabled to undertake it. I was astonished to find a person of such
mild, meek, and almost effeminate manners engaged in such a pursuit, and
still more to hear that he had been brought up to it from boyhood, and
was but following in the steps of his father, who was employed in the
same establishment in a situation of great trust and responsibility.
In the course of our bilingual conversations, I made no scruple of
expressing my perfect horror of gambling, at which he appeared to be
heartily amused, and attributed the feeling I manifested not so much to
moral principle as to constitutional peculiarity. It soon became
apparent to me that he had not himself the slightest idea of disgrace or
discredit as attachable to the profession of a gambler, so long as it
was carried on upon principles of honesty and fair-play. "What is
gambling," said he, "after all, but a species of exchange, skill for
skill, or chance for chance? It is true, there is no solid merchandise
in question; but, since you are determined to consider it in a moral
point of view, what, let me ask, does the merchant or the shopkeeper
care for the goods that pass through his hands? Is not his sole object
to profit by the transfer? Does he not speculate to gain? and is not all
speculation, morally considered, gambling? Now, all the professed
gamester does is to get rid of the lumbering medium of
trading-speculations--to clear the game, which all men are willing to
play, of the cumbrous machinery that clogs its movements when played
upon commercial principles, and to bring it to a crisis and a close at
once. You talk of the misery and ruin entailed upon families by
gambling; but depend upon it the same men who ruin themselves and
families by play would do precisely the same thing were there no such
thing as play. For one Frenchman ruined by hazard, ten Englishmen are
ruined by commerce. In fact, as a people, you gamble much more than we
do, though in a different way; and when you choose to gamble _as_ we do,
you do it to much greater extent, and with a recklessness to which our
habits in that respect afford no parallel. There is an Englishman now in
Paris who has repeatedly won and lost ten thousand francs at a sitting,
and whom you may see, if you choose to come with me, any evening you
like."
"What is his name?" I demanded.
"C----. He is a priest, too, I have heard, and of course, when at home,
a preacher of morality."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account