Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. V, No. XXIX., October, 1852Various
Religion
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. V, No. XXIX., October, 1852
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
An expression of hopeless despair settled upon the prisoner's face;
he again hung down his head in shame, and allowed the constables to
quietly strip off his jacket. Andrew Bridgman, who had gone to some
distance, returned while this was going on, and watched for what might
next disclose itself with tenfold curiosity and eagerness. "There are
stabs enough here, sure enough," exclaimed a constable, as he turned
up the shirt-sleeve on the prisoner's left arm. There were, indeed;
and in addition to them, _natural marks of two strawberries_ were
distinctly visible. The countenance of Andrew Bridgman grew ashy pale,
as his straining eyes glared upon the prisoner's naked arm. The next
moment he wrenched himself away, as with an effort, from the sight, and
staggered to an open window--sick, dizzy, fainting, it was at the time
believed, from the closeness of the atmosphere in the crowded room. Was
it not rather that he had recognized his long-lost brother--_the true
heir to the bulk of his deceased father's wealth_, against whom, he
might have thought, an indictment would scarcely lie for feloniously
entering his own house! He said nothing, however, and the two prisoners
were fully committed for trial.
Mr. Prince went down "special" to Bury, at the next assize, to defend
a gentleman accused of a grave offense, but the grand jury having
ignored the bill, he would probably have returned at once, had not
an attorney brought him a brief, very heavily marked, in defense of
"Robert Williams." "Strangely enough, too," remarked the attorney,
as he was about to go away, "the funds for the defense have been
supplied by Mr. Andrew Bridgman, whose house the prisoner is accused of
having burglariously entered. But this is confidential, as he is very
solicitous that his oddly-generous action should not be known." There
was, however, no valid defense. The ill-favored accomplice, why, I know
not, had been admitted king's evidence by the counsel for the crown,
and there was no resisting the accumulated evidence. The prisoner
was found guilty, and sentenced to be hanged. "I never intended," he
said, after the verdict was returned; and there was a tone of dejected
patience in his voice that affected one strangely, "I never intended to
commit violence against any one in the house, and but that my uncle--he
that was shot--said repeatedly that he knew a secret concerning Mr.
Bridgman (he didn't know, I am sure, that he was dead) which would
prevent us from being prosecuted if we were caught, I should not
have been persuaded to go with him. It was my first offense--in--in
housebreaking, I mean."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account