Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. V, No. XXV, June, 1852Various
General
Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. V, No. XXV, June, 1852
Various
American literature -- Periodicals; Civilization -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals
And when, upon the arrival of the King's Commission at Exeter, Mr.
Prince received a very full and carefully-drawn brief in defense--a
specious, but almost wholly unsupported story of the prisoner's
appeared all that could be relied upon in rebuttal of the evidence for
the crown. According to Edward Drysdale, he merely sought Mr. Bradshaw
upon the evening in question for the purpose of concluding with that
gentleman an arrangement for the separation of himself from his wife
and children, and their domiciliation at Rodney Place. It was further
averred that he was received with greater civility than he expected;
that the interview was a long one, during which he, Drysdale, had
seen nobody but Mr. Bradshaw, although he believed the aged and deaf
cook was in the kitchen. That he had arranged that Mrs. Drysdale and
his children should be early on the morrow with her uncle, and that
he had received the money found on his person and at his house from
the deceased's own hands, in order to pay the debt and costs in the
suit wherein execution was about to be levied on his furniture, and
that the residue was to be applied to his, the prisoner's, own use.
That the expressions deposed to by Anne Moody, and his own and Mrs.
Drysdale's emotion after his return home, which had told so heavily
against him in the examinations before the magistrates, were perfectly
reconcilable with this statement--as, indeed, they were--and did not,
therefore, bear the frightful meaning that had been attached to them.
With respect to the change of hats, that might easily have happened,
because his hat had been left on entering in the hall-passage, and in
his hurry, in coming out by the same way, he had no doubt mistaken
Berry's for his own; but he solemnly denied having been in the room,
or near the part of the house where his hat was alleged to have been
found. This was the gist of the explanation; but, unfortunately, it was
not sustained by any receivable testimony in any material particular.
True, Mrs. Drysdale, whom every body fully believed, declared that this
account exactly coincided with what her husband told her immediately
on arriving home in the post-chaise--but what of that? It was not what
story the prisoner had told, nor how many times he had told it, that
could avail, especially against the heavy improbabilities that weighed
upon his, at first view, plausible statement. How was it that, knowing
Mr. Bradshaw's almost insane dislike of himself, he did not counsel
his wife to make terms with her uncle, preparatory to her returning
to Rodney Place? And was it at all likely that Mr. Bradshaw, whose
implacable humor Mrs. Drysdale had experienced on the very day previous
to the murder, should have so suddenly softened toward the man he so
thoroughly hated and despised? I trow not; and the first consultation
on the case wore a wretchedly-dismal aspect, till the hawk-eye of Mr.
Prince lit upon an assertion of Thomas Burnham's, that he had gone to
Mr.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account