Harper's Pictorial Library of the World War, Volume XII : $b The Great Results of the War
History
Harper's Pictorial Library of the World War, Volume XII : $b The Great Results of the War
League of Nations; Treaty of Versailles (1919 June 28); World War, 1914-1918; World War, 1914-1918 -- Economic aspects; World War, 1914-1918 -- Finance
last year of war, 1918--19, a little over one-quarter of the war
expenditures were met from war taxes. For the entire five years the
proportion of war taxes to war expenditures was slightly over 17 per
cent.
In the other belligerent countries the showing was by no means so good.
France struggled under a double difficulty. In the first place France
was invaded at the very outset of the war, and the territory occupied,
although relatively small in extent, represented the richest and the
most industrially developed part of the country. This operated largely
to reduce the ordinary revenues. In the second place the resultant
economic confusion, as well as the general political situation, made it
very difficult to impose any new taxes at all. The consequence was that
for the first three years of the war, the tax revenues of France did not
even suffice to defray the ordinary peace expenditures.
After a little while, indeed, France found it possible to levy some war
taxes; but these were exceedingly slight compared with what had been
accomplished in Great Britain. The result is that the new war taxes of
France were only just about sufficient to make up the deficit on the
ordinary peace budget--a deficit caused chiefly by the devastation of
the occupied territory. In France, therefore, we may say that as a
result no part of the expenditures was met by war taxes.
In Italy the situation was a little better. Italy had not been invaded
and its financial situation was not so desperate as that of France.
Moreover, Italy entered the war somewhat later and did not have to
endure a strain for so long a time. Italy consequently proceeded as soon
as possible to levy new war taxes; but as Italy had always been
relatively overtaxed, as compared with Great Britain, it was not
feasible to do as much. As a result, the war taxes levied by Italy were
just about sufficient to pay the interest on the war loans. While Italy,
therefore, did better than France, she also was not able to defray any
of the war expenditures proper out of war taxation.
The condition of Russia soon became worse than that of France and Italy,
and even before the October revolution, Russia was able to put very
little reliance upon revenues from war taxation.
Among the Central Powers the situation was much the same, but for a
different reason. Germany at the outset of the war had so confidently
counted upon victory and upon huge indemnities that it resolved to
defray its war expenses entirely from loans. It must, however, be
observed that in Germany a not insignificant part of the war expenses
were met by the separate states; and in these various states a
considerable increase of taxation was provided for at once. As the war
proceeded and the hopes of a speedy and complete victory gradually faded
away, Germany began to change her policy and decided, especially from
1916 on, to impose more and more taxes. The result was that by the end
of the war Germany had done a little better than France.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account