These questions had all referred to the alternation of _two_ units;
either a unit with an empty space, or with a space of different
filling. How did the apperception differ when _three_ repeated units
alternated with each other? To test this, three spaces were taken
equally wide (110 mm.) and equally distant from each other (150 mm.),
but with three different designs within them. These designs were of
the same general character and importance although different, and
repeated themselves regularly.
[Illustration: Fig. 21]
The subjects were asked as before to describe their reaction on the
series. Not one of all the number was able to _feel_ the repetition
of the three units; what pleasure they got from the series (if indeed
they got any) was from other sources. The general type of answer was
formulated more fully by L. He saw 1, then looked for 2 and found it
different, but could have included it in the series if it were not for
3. That being still different sent 1 and 2 out of mind, so that he
could not _feel_ any repetition of 1 when he met it again. He felt a
certain sense of repetition in that the spacing and general motifs were
the same, but there was no pleasure in that. What pleasure he got was
wholly intellectual, not immediate, except for a slight pleasure in
their uniformity of position. In him the rhythmic feeling had always
been of the strongest, but he found in this experience none whatever.
It was simply impossible to keep the three units going at once. Another
temporal subject tried to group 2 and 3 as one element, with one as
an alternate, thus reducing it to a rhythm of twos. This process was
labored, but otherwise no enjoyment was possible. The spatial subjects
derived what pleasure they could, either from the units separately,
with no regard to their repetition, or from some method of grouping, by
which their difference could be overlooked. One expressed his pleasure
solely in terms of contrast of the white strings against a black
ground. Any immediate feeling for the repetition was impossible for
either type. It will be noticed that the _feeling_ of the repetition is
quite different from the _knowing_ it is there. They were all perfectly
conscious that 1 was repeated again after 3, but could not _feel_ it,
while repeated simply after 2, they _could_ feel it.
Next, the series was varied again. The size of the blocks, instead of
being alike, was varied three ways, while the designs remained similar.
[Illustration: Fig. 22]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account