But what of the cases where the human form is repeated in a series,
and does not vary? Examples of this are rare, but they do occur, and
are interesting, since they throw light on what has been already said.
In the whole collection of photographs only two were found where a
series of identical statues of the human form occurred,--_The Porch
of the Maidens_ in the Erectheum of Athens, and the _Baths of the
Forum_ in Pompeii. In the former case the left knee of the caryatids
on the right of the centre, and the right knee of those on the left
of it, are raised a little; but aside from this slight variation the
six statues are exactly alike. In the latter case a row of titans all
around the interior bear the ceiling on their uplifted forearms and are
all alike. These two examples are very perfect of their kind, and, far
from offending us, are very satisfactory. The reason is obvious. In
both cases the statues are not the æsthetic end in themselves, but are
there for a purpose, namely, that of a support. They are not ends but
means to something else, and as soon as we feel _that_ in regard to any
work which would otherwise be of individual significance, it ceases to
be individual, or to demand a peculiar expression different from all
others, but may be duplicated without offence. Therefore, since the
support of the superstructure obviously is dependent on the maidens
in the one case and on the giants in the other, and since instead of
existing simply for their own value they are there to hold up the roof,
their artistic significance changes at once from _ends_ to _means_,
and variation is not required. Moreover, it will be found in the
majority of cases that we demand this invariability in actual supports.
Although we find but these two cases where caryatids are actually
identical, we find also that in most cases the caryatids do not really
uphold the weight, but a pillar or pier behind them supplies the real
architectural support, and, that although they have a place in front of
the pillar and give an apparent assistance in bearing the weight of the
roof, yet the eye is not deceived. We see that the work is really done
by the pillar behind them, so they that resume their place as artistic
ends demanding variation, and not as means to something else. The
following examples were found:
_Milan. Arca di S. Pietro Martire._ Pillars uphold the arch while four
statues of women stand just in front. The pillars bear the weight
although the statues add strength to the whole. The statues are varied.
_Dijon. House of Caryatids._ Piers behind the caryatids give real
supports to the roof, while the figures added for decoration are all
varied.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account