So far as these records go, they entirely confirm the results of other
investigators as to the direction and the reversal of the nystagmus. In
each of the cases the after-image moved with the slow eye-movements,
reversing its direction with these slow movements, while the visual
field whenever it was observed (the eyes were kept closed during the
rotation) moved in the opposite direction to that of the after-image
and the slow eye-movement. It is well known that after-images move
_with_ every involuntary eye-movement, and although they disappear
during voluntary eye-jumps,[21] they reappear at the end of the jump in
a position that is related to the new fixation-point exactly as the old
position was to the former fixation-point. These after-images, then,
are seen during the slow eye-movements whose direction they follow;
but are not seen during the quick movements, when they must naturally
move in the direction of these quick movements. And aside from this it
is possible to observe introspectively that the after-image disappears
at that side of the visual field toward which the slow eye-movements
tend, and is for a moment invisible before it reappears on the other
side of the field. As was shown above, the visual field always moves
opposite to the direction of the slow eye-movements, as must of course
be the case if there is no inhibition of vision during these movements.
The simultaneous appearance of the after-image moving with, and the
rest of the visual field moving contrary to, the direction of the slow
eye-movements, with a uniform absence of the converse phenomena, seems
to prove that vision is unimpaired during these slow movements, while
it is completely inhibited during the rapid phases of the nystagmus.
Purkinje himself[22] called the slower phases "involuntary and
unconscious," meaning by "unconscious" not that the visual field was
not seen (for it just then is seen), but that the movement of the
eyeball during the slow phases was not felt. I have observed, with
the confirmation of several subjects, that _this_ movement can also
not voluntarily be inhibited; whereas the swift movement is so far
voluntary that it can be inhibited at pleasure. It is possible, that
is, to fix the eyes on that side of the field toward which the slow
movements are directed, but not on any point at the other side of the
field. The slow movements, then, during which vision is possible, are
purely reflex. These slow movements, purely reflex and yielding clear
vision, with the rapid movements, partly under voluntary control and
attended by an inhibition of vision, present a parallelism, that may
be not without significance, to the "pursuit" eye-movements (Dodge's
"second type"), that are likewise relatively slow, are reflex, and
yield remarkably clear vision, and the ordinary voluntary eye-jumps
(Dodge's "first type"), that are relatively rapid, and are, like the
rapid nystagmiform movements, attended by a central inhibition of
vision.
FOOTNOTES:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account