It is of course a well-known psychological fact that a light of
greater intensity will take less time in coming into consciousness
than one of less intensity. In this case, however, it was necessary to
find some way of showing such differences between lights which were
very little different in intensity. For one is practically unable to
see any difference in intensity between the parts of a stationary
image. So unless it could be shown that a difference in intensity
between two sources of illumination, so small as to be imperceptible
to the observer, will nevertheless make its presence known by the
appearance of the brighter light in consciousness before the other,
the explanation which I have suggested for the curvature of the images
would have to be abandoned.
The following experiments do show, as I believe, that of two sources
of light not perceptibly different in intensity, the brighter will
appear in consciousness before the other, and that in the case of these
figures the curvature of the image is due to a heightened intensity of
the light in the centre through reënforcement of the excitation there
present by stimulation spreading from the ends.
EXPERIMENT I
In the first of these experiments three dots of about three sixteenths
of an inch were placed in a vertical row about three eighths of an inch
apart (Plate IV, Fig. 1). No change was then observed in the form of
the figure. The row of dots swung across the opening in a perfectly
vertical line one directly above the other (Plate IV, Fig. 2). They
were presumably too far apart for irradiation to take place between
them. When, however, another dot was interposed between each end dot
and the centre dot (Plate IV, Fig. 3), so that the excitement could
extend from one dot to the next, the front of the line of dots no
longer appeared vertical, but decidedly convex, the centre dot being
perhaps three eighths of an inch before the dots on the ends (Plate IV,
Fig. 4).
[Illustration: PLATE IV.]
Absolutely the only difference between the two cases was that in the
one, irradiation presumably could not occur, while in the other it
conceivably could.
EXPERIMENT II
In the second of these experiments the curvature of a line of dots was
observed and measured. Then the centre dots were slightly darkened
(Plate IV, Fig. 5) by shading lightly with a lead pencil the ground
glass which travelled with the pendulum and held in place the card
from which the dots were cut, until the front of the image lost its
curvature and appeared vertical (Plate IV, Fig. 6). The pendulum was
then stopped and the row of dots observed closely, in order to see
whether the dots in the centre were perceptibly of less intensity than
those on the ends. No perceptible difference was found.
EXPERIMENT III
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account