From a consideration of these phenomena we were led to discuss the
functions of the rods and cones in the retina of the eye, and the
suggestion was made that differences in color-vision were due to
central rather than retinal processes, and that in many cases of
partial or total color-blindness the retina would be found normal and
the defect in vision due to a lesion in some more central structure.
The various forms of visual irradiation which have been described
by a number of different writers we found to be all forms of one
rather simple process. Resistance, removal of resistance upon further
stimulation, and recurrence of resistance through fatigue in some part
of the optic tract, together with the spreading of stimulation over the
retina (probably through the molecular layers) from one afferent nerve
to another are assumed as the minimal requirements which are sufficient
to explain the five forms of irradiation which have been considered in
this paper.
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 23: Image no. 5 appeared with the concavity in front. In the
centre of the figure appeared a dark grayish splotch of light, very
much darker than the rest of the image. This is due, most probably, to
the presence of Charpentier's phenomenon of recurrent bands. If this
happens in this figure the ends of the recurrent bright images would
overlap while the centres would not, so that the black bands appearing,
as it were, through interstices in the central part of the figure,
would seem like a dark splotch, especially since the outlines of the
bands are vague and hazy. The back end of the figure had the effect of
being vertical or nearly so. This is probably due to the same cause as
that which made the circular figure to appear as it did, namely, the
negative after-image overlapping the positive after-image. The front
of this black image is usually of about the same shape as the front of
the real figure which it follows. If this is so, then, in this case, it
would make the back part of the image pretty nearly vertical.]
[Footnote 24: The intensity of the objective stimulation may be
represented by the line _AB_. If there were no reënforcement of
stimulation the whole figure would be flat on top and of this height.
The difference between _AB_ and _AC_, or _BC_, represents the increase
of intensity due to irradiation at the most favorably situated portion
of the figure. The other portions receive increments proportional to
their location, as indicated in the diagram.]
[Footnote 25: Favorable localization will of course depend largely on
the shape of the figure in which the point is situated. Thus one in the
angle of a triangle or at the horn of a crescent would have much less
reënforcement of excitation than another point, say halfway down the
side.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account