Harvey's Views on the Use of the Circulation of the BloodCurtis, John Green
History
Harvey's Views on the Use of the Circulation of the Blood
Curtis, John Green
Blood -- Circulation; Harvey, William, 1578-1657
that he is thinking not only of the foam of the semen but of other
widely different kinds of prolific foam as well? Does he not seem
to think that, in general, the power of bringing matter to life as
a new individual dwells typically in a bubble representing earth,
water, and air, and charged with soul and with generative heat, for
the presence of which the sun is responsible, heat other than that
of elemental fire?[320] It is not fanciful--for Aristotle himself,
we remember, has done so incidentally--to connect such speculation
with the ancient myth of Aphrodite, the goddess of love, who sprang
from the foam which had risen upon the sea, about the immortal
genitals of Uranus, which had been severed and cast therein; Uranus
being the heavens personified.[427]
Before the time of Aristotle important thinkers had held the
heavenly bodies, and even the heavens themselves, to be fire;[428]
and we have seen that after his time Cleanthes did the same, simply
setting apart the generative fire from the destructive. Aristotle
denied that the sun is fire, though he could not have denied that
its radiant generative heat produces no different sensation from
that of sterile fire kindled upon earth. He did not identify the
sun's heat with ether, the "body on high," though he styled the heat
of the semen a "body" analogous to the ether. How then did Aristotle
obtain heat from the ethereal sun? The point is crucial and he met
it; but in so doing he revealed a very weak place in his towering
fabric of speculation. In his treatise On Heaven, speaking of the
heavenly bodies, he says:--
"The heat and light from these arise from the friction which the
air undergoes by reason of their course. For it is the nature of
motion to fire even wood and stone and steel."
He then speaks of projectiles, and says:--
"These, then, are heated because borne onward in air which
becomes fire from the shock of the motion. But each of the
bodies on high is borne onward in its sphere, so that they
are not fired; while the air, being beneath the sphere of the
circling body,[429] is heated of necessity as this [body]
is borne onward, and mainly where the sun is set in place.
Therefore, when the sun approaches and rises and is above us,
heat is generated. Be it said, then, of the heavenly bodies,
that neither are they fiery nor are they borne on in fire."[430]
In his Meteorology Aristotle boldly says: "The sun, which is held to
be especially hot, appears white, but not to be like fire."[431]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account