Hawkins Electrical Guide v. 01 (of 10): Questions, Answers, & Illustrations, A progressive course of study for engineers, electricians, students and those desiring to acquire a working knowledge of electricity and its applicationsHawkins, N. (Nehemiah)
Science
Hawkins Electrical Guide v. 01 (of 10): Questions, Answers, & Illustrations, A progressive course of study for engineers, electricians, students and those desiring to acquire a working knowledge of electricity and its applications
Hawkins, N. (Nehemiah)
Electrical engineering -- Handbooks, manuals, etc.
Ans. Across its horizontal diameter into an upper and lower half, as shown
in fig. 206, the lower half being seated on, or more frequently cast in
one piece with the bed plate.
=Ques. What is the objection to dividing a yoke?=
Ans. The joints introduced, even if carefully faced and well bolted
together, add a little reluctance to the magnetic circuit.
[Illustration: FIGS. 213 to 215.--Some methods of attaching detachable
cores. The core seat is machined to receive the core, it being necessary
to secure good contact in order to avoid a large increase in the
reluctance of the magnetic circuit.]
=Ques. How does this affect the poles adjacent to the points, and what
provision is made?=
Ans. It weakens them, and in order to overcome this, the coils of these
poles are given a few extra turns.
=Ques. How is the reluctance of a yoke joint reduced?=
Ans. By enlarging the area of contact; the flange for the bolts furnishes
the necessary increase.
=Ques. What determines chiefly the cost of field magnets?=
Ans. The material used in making the cores and their shape.
=Ques. How does this affect the cost?=
Ans. Since considerable cross sectional area of core is required, the
problem confronting the designer is to design the core by judicious
selection of material and shape, that the required number of turns in the
magnetizing coil is obtained with the shortest length of wire.
[Illustration: FIGS. 216 to 221.--Comparison of field magnet core
sections. The shorter the perimeter or outside boundary of the core for a
given cross sectional area, the less will be the amount of copper required
for the magnetizing coils. All the above sections are of equal area, and
the figures marked on each represent relative values for the perimeters,
the circle for convenience being taken at 100.]
=Ques. What is the principal objection to the use of cast iron for core
construction?=
Ans. Since its sectional area must be considerably more than wrought iron,
a much greater quantity of copper is required for the magnetizing coils.
Copper is expensive, while cast iron cores are less expensive
than equivalent ones of wrought iron; in this connection, it is
interesting to observe how different designers aim at true
economy in construction.
Steel is sometimes used in place of wrought iron, and though
less efficient magnetically, it can be cast into the desired
shape, thus avoiding the somewhat expensive processes of forging
and machining, which are necessary in the case of wrought iron.
=Ques. What form of core requires the least amount of copper for the
magnetizing coils, and why?=
Ans. The cylindrical core, because it has the shortest periphery or
boundary for a given area enclosed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account