There is an evident gap, I had almost said a gulf, between the
architectural mind of the eleventh and that of the thirteenth century. A
vertical tendency, a longing after lightness and freedom, appears; and
with them a longing to reproduce the graces of nature and art. And here
I ask you to look for yourselves at the buildings of this new era--there
is a beautiful specimen in yonder arcade {304}--and judge for yourselves
whether they, and even more than they the Decorated style into which they
developed, do not remind you of the forest shapes?
And if they remind you: must they not have reminded those who shaped
them? Can it have been otherwise? We know that the men who built were
earnest. The carefulness, the reverence, of their work have given a
subject for some of Mr. Ruskin's noblest chapters, a text for some of his
noblest sermons. We know that they were students of vegetable form. That
is proved by the flowers, the leaves, even the birds, with which they
enwreathed their capitals and enriched their mouldings. Look up there,
and see.
You cannot look at any good church-work from the thirteenth to the middle
of the fifteenth century, without seeing that leaves and flowers were
perpetually in the workman's mind. Do you fancy that stems and boughs
were never in his mind? He kept, doubtless, in remembrance the
fundamental idea, that the Christian church should symbolise a grot or
cave. He could do no less; while he again and again saw hermits around
him dwelling and worshipping in caves, as they had done ages before in
Egypt and Syria; while he fixed, again and again, the site of his convent
and his minster in some secluded valley guarded by cliffs and rocks, like
Vale Crucis in North Wales. But his minster stood often not among rocks
only, but amid trees; in some clearing in the primeval forest, as Vale
Crucis was then. At least he could not pass from minster to minster,
from town to town, without journeying through long miles of forest. Do
you think that the awful shapes and shadows of that forest never haunted
his imagination as he built? He would have cut down ruthlessly, as his
predecessors the early missionaries did, the sacred trees amid which Thor
and Odin had been worshipped by the heathen Saxons; amid which still
darker deities were still worshipped by the heathen tribes of Eastern
Europe. But he was the descendant of men who had worshipped in those
groves; and the glamour of them was upon him still. He peopled the wild
forest with demons and fairies: but that did not surely prevent his
feeling its ennobling grandeur, its chastening loneliness. His ancestors
had held the oaks for trees of God, even as the Jews held the Cedar, and
the Hindoos likewise; for the Deodara pine is not only, botanists tell
us, the same as the Cedar of Lebanon: but its very name--the
Deodara--signifies nought else but "The tree of God."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account