2. “Whatever disallows the heave-offering, renders the hands unclean in a
secondary degree. One hand can render the other hand unclean.” The words
of R. Joshua. But the Sages say, “a secondary cannot make a
secondary.”(771) He said to them, “and are not Holy Scriptures
secondaries, and they render the hands unclean?” They said to him, “we
cannot judge the words of the Law from the words of the scribes, nor the
words of the scribes from the words of the Law, nor the words of the
scribes from other words of the scribes.”
3. Straps of phylacteries with the phylacteries, render the hands unclean.
R. Simeon says, “the straps of phylacteries do not render the hands
unclean.”
4. The margin in a book of the Law, at the top and bottom, at the
beginning and end, renders the hands unclean. R. José says, “in the end it
does not render the hands unclean, until the roller be attached.”
5. A book of the Law which is erased, but in which there remain
eighty-five letters like the portion, “And it came to pass when the Ark
set forward,”(772) renders the hands unclean. Any roll in which there are
written eighty-five letters like the portion, “And it came to pass when
the Ark set forward,” renders the hands unclean. All sacred Scriptures
render the hands unclean. The Canticles and Ecclesiastes render the hands
unclean. R. Judah says, “Canticles render the hands unclean, but
Ecclesiastes is in dispute.” R. José says, “Ecclesiastes does not render
the hands unclean, but the Canticles are in dispute.” R. Simeon says,
“Ecclesiastes is one in which the school of Shammai is less strict, and
the school of Hillel more rigid.” R. Simeon, the son of Azai, said, “I
received by tradition from the mouths of the seventy-two elders, on the
day they inducted R. Eleazar, the son of Azariah, into the president’s
seat, that Canticles and Ecclesiastes render the hands unclean.” R. Akiba
said, “God forbid! no man in Israel ever questioned that the Canticles
render the hands unclean, as the whole world is not equal to the day on
which the Canticles were given to Israel; for all the Scriptures are holy,
but the Canticles are Holy of Holies. They only disputed in reference to
Ecclesiastes.” R. Jochanan, the son of Joshua, the son of R. Akiba’s
father-in-law, said, “according to the words of the son of Azai, thus they
disputed, and thus they decided.”
Chapter IV
1. On that day(773) they voted and decided, “that a foot-bath containing
from two logs to nine cabs,(774) which was split,(775) may become unclean
from pressure,”(776) although R. Akiba says, “that a foot-bath is as its
name.”(777)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account