Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Volume 1 (of 3)Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Philosophy
Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Volume 1 (of 3)
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Philosophy -- History
Generally speaking, the course of this antithesis in history is that
Thought first of all comes forth within Religion, as not free and in
separate manifestations. Secondly, it strengthens itself, feels itself
to be resting upon itself, holds and conducts itself inimically towards
the other form, and does not recognize itself therein. In the third
place, it concludes by acknowledging itself as in this other. Or else
Philosophy has to begin with carrying on its work entirely on its
own account, isolating Thought from all popular beliefs, and taking
for itself quite a different field of operation, a field for which
the world of ordinary ideas lies quite apart, so that the two exist
peacefully side by side, or, to put it better, so that no reflection
on their opposition is arrived at. Just as little did the thought of
reconciling them occur, since in the popular beliefs the same content
appeared as in any external form other than the notion—the thought
that is, of explaining and justifying popular belief, in order thus to
be able again to express the conceptions of free thought in the form of
popular religion.
Thus we see Philosophy first restrained and confined within the range
of the Greek heathen world; then resting upon itself, it goes forth
against popular religion and takes up an unfriendly attitude to it,
until it grasps that religion in its innermost and recognizes itself
therein. Thus the ancient Greek philosophers generally respected the
popular religion, or at least they did not oppose it, or reflect upon
it. Those coming later, including even Xenophanes, handled popular
ideas most severely, and thus many so-called atheists made their
appearance. But as the spheres of popular conception, and abstract
thought stood peacefully side by side, we also find Greek philosophers
of even a later period in development, in whose case speculative
thought and the act of worship, as also the pious invocation upon
and sacrifice to the gods, coexist in good faith, and not in mere
hypocrisy. Socrates was accused of teaching other gods than those
belonging to the popular religion; his _δαιμόνιον_ was indeed opposed
to the principles of Greek morals and religion, but at the same time
he followed quite honestly the usages of his religion, and we know
besides that his last request was to ask his friends to offer a cock to
Æsculapius—a desire quite inconsistent with his conclusions regarding
the existence of God and above all regarding morality. Plato declaimed
against the poets and their gods. It was in a much later time that
the Neo-platonists first recognized in the popular mythology rejected
earlier by the philosophers, the universal content; they transposed
and translated it into what is significant for thought, and thus used
mythology itself as a symbolical imagery for giving expression to their
formulas.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account