Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Volume 1 (of 3)Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Philosophy
Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Volume 1 (of 3)
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Philosophy -- History
removed, and many contingent circumstances must find their entrance.
But that there is a Reason there, must certainly be recognized, and it
is essential so to comprehend and grasp mythology.
But Mythology must remain excluded from our history of Philosophy.
The reason of this is found in the fact that in Philosophy we have
to do not with theorems generally, or with thoughts which only are
_implicite_ contained in some particular form or other, but with
thoughts which are explicit, and only in so far as they are explicit
and in so far as a content such as that belonging to Religion, has
come to consciousness in the form of Thought. And this is just what
forms the immense distinction which we saw above, between capacity and
actuality. The theorems which are _implicite_ contained within Religion
do not concern us; they must be in the form of thoughts, since Thought
alone is the absolute form of the Idea.
In many mythologies, images are certainly used along with their
significance, or else the images are closely attended by their
interpretation. The ancient Persians worshipped the sun, or fire, as
being the highest existence; the first cause in the Persian Religion
is Zervane Akerene—unlimited time, eternity. This simple eternal
existence possesses according to Diogenes Lærtius (I. 8), “the two
principles Ormuzd (_Ὠρομάσδης_) and Ahriman (_Ἀρειμάνος_), the rulers
over good and evil.” Plutarch in writing on Isis and Osiris (T. II. p.
369, ed. Xyl.) says, “It is not one existence which holds and rules
the whole, but good is mingled with evil; nature as a rule brings
forth nothing pure and simple; it is not one dispenser, who, like a
host, gives out and mixes up the drink from two different barrels. But
through two opposed and inimical principles of which the one impels
towards what is right, and the other in the opposite direction, if not
the whole world, at least this earth is influenced in different ways.
Zoroaster has thus emphatically set up the one principle (Ormuzd) as
being the Light, and the other (Ahriman) as the Darkness. Between the
two (_μέσος δὲ ἀμφοῖν_) is Mithra, hence called by the Persians the
Mediator (_μεσίτης_).” Mithra is then likewise substance, the universal
existence, the sun raised to a totality. It is not the mediator between
Ormuzd and Ahriman by establishing peace and leaving each to remain
as it was; it does not partake of good and evil both, like an unblest
middle thing, but it stands on the side of Ormuzd and strives with him
against the evil. Ahriman is sometimes called the first-born son of the
Light, but Ormuzd only remained within the Light. At the creation of
the visible world, Ormuzd places on the earth in his incomprehensible
kingdom of Light, the firm arches of the heavens which are above yet
surrounded on every side with the first original Light. Midway to the
earth is the high hill Albordi, which reaches into the source of Light.
Ormuzd’s empire of Light extended uninterruptedly over the firm vault
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account