Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Volume 3 (of 3)Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
PhilosophyPhilosophy
Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Volume 3 (of 3)
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Philosophy -- History
a. Boehme thus represents God not as the empty unity, but as this
self-separating unity of absolute opposites; one must not, however, here
expect a clearly defined distinction. The first, the one, the Father, has
likewise the mode of natural existence; thus, like Proclus, he speaks of
this God being simple essence. This simple essence he calls the hidden;
and he therefore names it the _Temperamentum_, this unity of what is
different, in which all is tempered. We find him also calling it the
great Salitter—now the divine and now the natural Salitter—as well as
Salniter. When he talks of this great salitter as of something known to
us, we cannot first of all conceive what it means. But it is a vulgar
corruption of the word _sal nitri_, saltpetre (which is still called
salniter in Austria), _i.e._ just the neutral and in truth universal
existence. The divine pomp and state is this, that in God a more glorious
nature dwells, trees, plants, &c. “In the divine pomp or state two things
have principally to be considered; salitter or the divine power, which
brings forth all fruits, and marcurius or the sound.”[129] This great
salitter is the unrevealed existence, just as the Neo-Platonic unity is
without knowledge of itself and likewise unrecognized.
b. This first substance contains all powers or qualities as not yet
separated; thus this salitter likewise appears as the body of God, who
embraces all qualities in Himself. Quality thus becomes an important
conception, the first determination with Boehme; and he begins with
qualities in his work “Morgenröthe im Aufgang.” He afterwards associates
with this the conferring of quality, and in the same place says: “Quality
is the mobility, boiling, springing, and driving of a thing.” These
qualities he then tries to define, but the account he gives of them is
vague. “As for example heat which burns, consumes and drives forth all
whatsoever comes into it which is not of the same property; and again
it enlightens and warms all cold, wet, and dark things; it compacts and
hardens soft things. It contains likewise two other kinds in it, namely
Light and Fierceness” (Negativity); “of which the light or the heart of
the heat is in itself a pleasant, joyful glance or lustre, a power of
life ... and a source of the heavenly kingdom of joy. For it makes all
things in this world living and moving; all flesh, trees, leaves, and
grass grow in this world, as in the power of the light, and have their
light therein, viz. in the good. Again, it contains also a fierceness or
wrath which burns, consumes and spoils. This wrath or fierceness springs,
drives, and elevates itself in the light, and makes the light movable. It
wrestles and fights together in its two-fold source. The light subsists
in God without heat, but it does not subsist so in nature. For all
qualities in nature are one in another, in the same manner as God is all.
For God” (the Father) “is the Heart.” On another occasion (Vom dreifachen
Leben des Menschen, chap.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account