Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Volume 3 (of 3)Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
PhilosophyPhilosophy
Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Volume 3 (of 3)
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
Philosophy -- History
Buridan, a Nominalist, inclines to the view of the Determinists that the
will is determined by circumstances. Against him is cited the case of
the ass which, being placed between two equal bundles of hay, perforce
perished from hunger.
Louis XI., in 1473, confiscated the books of the Nominalists and
interdicted the teaching of their doctrines, but in the year 1481 this
interdict was removed. In the theological and philosophical faculty
Aristotle is said to have been interpreted and studied, as were also his
commentators, Averroës, Albertus Magnus, and Thomas Aquinas.[44]
5. FORMAL DIALECTIC.
The study of dialectics was carried to a very great height, but it
was quite formal in character; this constitutes the fifth point for
consideration. With this is closely connected the interminable finding
out of _termini technici_. This formal dialectic was very ingenious in
devising objects, problems and questions, destitute of all religious and
philosophic interest, on which to practise its method of procedure. The
last remark that we have, however, in this connection to make regarding
the Scholastics is this, that it was not only into the ecclesiastical
system that they introduced all possible formal relations of the
understanding, but that also objects intelligible in themselves—the
intellectual conceptions and religious ideas—they represented as
immediately and sensuously real, as brought down into the externality
of altogether sensuous relations, and in these relations subjected
to systematic investigation. Originally, it is true, the basis was
spiritual, but the externality in which it was at once comprehended,
made of the spiritual something perfectly unspiritual. It may therefore
be said that, on the one hand, the Scholastics showed great profundity
in their treatment of Church dogma; and, on the other hand, that they
secularized it by placing it in quite inappropriate external relations;
thus here we have the worst kind of secularity. For the dogma of the
Church explicitly contains, in the historical form of the Christian
religion, a number of ordinary conceptions determined in an external
way, which are connected with the spiritual, it is true, but trench
upon sensuous relationships. If a network of such relationships is then
contrived, there arises a host of oppositions, contrasts, contradictions,
which have not the very slightest interest for us. It is this aspect of
the matter that the Scholastics have taken up and handled with finite
dialectic; and it is on this account that the Scholastics in later times
were so much ridiculed. Of this I have some examples to give.
a. JULIAN, ARCHBISHOP OF TOLEDO.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account