"Turning from probabilities to experience, I ask your Honor out of his
memory of years of service upon the bench, what does the arrested
thief—taken like this one, with the loot in his possession—what does he
do? Why, he either confesses his crime, or he tells you that he is not
the thief but an innocent third party, who unwittingly received the loot
from the man of straw, whom his imagination and his necessities have
created. That latter alternative is the defense of this alleged
minister of the Gospel! He had not the honesty to confess, but tells
instead that same old lie which criminals and felons have been telling
in that same witness chair since this Court was first established.
"Yet this defendant’s story has not even the merit of a pretense to
ignorance that the goods he held were stolen goods. He boldly admits
that he knew they were stolen; that he was personally acquainted with
the owner; that he knew the distress of her mind; knew the police
departments of half a dozen cities were searching for the jewels, and
that the newspapers were giving the widest publicity to the facts and
thus joining in the chase for loot and looter. And yet he calmly
permits these diamonds to repose in his vault with never a word or hint
to calm the distress of his friend or relieve the peace officers of
burdensome labors in which they were engaging and the unnecessary
expense which they were thus putting upon the taxpayers who support
them!
"Why, your Honor, if the witness’s own story is true, he has given this
Court an abundant ground for holding him to answer to the Superior
Court, not indeed upon the exact charge named in that complaint, but as
an accessory after the fact to said charge.
"But it is not true. To use his own phrase, it is wickedly and damnably
false! So palpably false that it collapses upon the mere examination of
your Honor’s mind without argument from me.
"Yet I cannot close without calling attention to the sheer recklessness
with which this thief and perjurer has heightened the infamy of his
position by an act of brazen sacrilege. He has sought to make plausible
his weak, unimaginative lie that he received these goods instead of
stealing them, by pretending that he received them in his capacity as a
religious confessor, under conditions that bound him to a silence which
the voice of God alone could break.
"That, in itself, is a claim that should bring the blush of shame to the
cheek and rouse the hot resentment of every honest minister and of every
honest priest, and make them join with the outraged feelings of honest
laymen and of citizens generally in demanding that justice descend upon
this man and strike him from the pedestal of self-righteous egotism upon
which he stands.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account