Classical literature; Greece -- History -- Peloponnesian War, 431-404 B.C.; Greece -- History -- Spartan and Theban Supremacies, 404-362 B.C.
"Now if he had been your friend, however much he was my national foe,
I do confess it had been scarce honourable of me to have stabbed him to
death in your presence: but why, I should like to ask, should the man
who betrayed you be less your enemy than mine? 'Ah, but,' I hear some
one retort, 'he came of his own accord.' I presume, sir, you mean that
had he chanced to be slain by somebody at a distance from your state,
that somebody would have won your praise; but now, on the ground that
he came back here to work mischief on the top of mischief, 'he had the
right to live'! (8) In what part of Hellas, tell me, sir, do Hellenes
keep a truce with traitors, double-dyed deserters, and tyrants?
Moreover, I must remind you that you passed a resolution--if I mistake
not, it stands recorded in your parliamentary minutes--that 'renegades
are liable to be apprehended (9) in any of the allied cities.' Now, here
is a renegade restoring himself without any common decree of the allied
states: will any one tell me on what ground this person did not deserve
to die? What I maintain, sirs, is that if you put me to death, by so
doing you will be aiding and abetting your bitterest foe; while, by
a verdict sanctioning the justice of my conduct, you will prove your
willingness to protect the interests not of yourselves only, but of the
whole body of your allies."
(8) Or, "he was wrongfully slain."
(9) For this right of extradition see Plut. "Lys." xxvii.
The Thebans on hearing these pleadings decided that Euphron had only
suffered the fate which he deserved. His own countrymen, however,
conveyed away the body with the honours due to a brave and good man, and
buried him in the market-place, where they still pay pious reverence to
his memory as "a founder of the state." So strictly, it would seem, do
the mass of mankind confine the term brave and good to those who are the
benefactors of themselves.
IV
B.C. 366. And so ends the history of Euphron. I return to the point
reached at the commencement of this digression. (1) The Phliasians were
still fortifying Thyamia, and Chares was still with them, when Oropus
(2) was seized by the banished citizens of that place. The Athenians
in consequence despatched an expedition in full force to the point of
danger, and recalled Chares from Thyamia; whereupon the Sicyonians and
the Arcadians seized the opportunity to recapture the harbour of Sicyon.
Meanwhile the Athenians, forced to act single-handed, with none of their
allies to assist them, retired from Oropus, leaving that town in the
hands of the Thebans as a deposit till the case at issue could be
formally adjudicated.
(1) See above, VII. ii. 23; iii. 3; Diod. xv. 76.
(2) See Thuc. viii. 60.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account