Helon's Pilgrimage to Jerusalem, Volume 2 (of 2): A picture of Judaism, in the century which preceded the advent of our Savior.Strauss, Friedrich
History
Helon's Pilgrimage to Jerusalem, Volume 2 (of 2): A picture of Judaism, in the century which preceded the advent of our Savior.
Strauss, Friedrich
Jews -- History -- To 70 A.D. -- Fiction
What is _now_ called the rose of Jericho is a species of _thlaspi_,
according to Pococke. Mariti describes it as a small plant, having a
number of stems which diverge from the earth; they are covered with few
leaves but loaded with flowers, which appear red in the bud, but turn
paler as they expand, and at length become white entirely. The flowers,
he says, have a great resemblance to those of the elder, but have no
smell. This can hardly be the plant of which Wisdom says, (Eccles. xxiv.
14.) “I was exalted like a palm-tree in Engaddi, and a rose plant in
Jericho.”
Page 162.—_The Dead Sea._] Of the ancient geographers, Strabo has given
the fullest account of the Dead Sea, but strangely confounding it with
the lake of Sirbonis, (xvi. p. 763. 4.) He particularly mentions the
tradition of the country, that the cities had been destroyed by an
earthquake and an eruption of sulphur and fire. It is not surprising
that where there was so much to astonish, imagination should have
exaggerated even the real wonders of the scene. What is mentioned in the
text is agreeable to the observations of the latest travellers, except
that it does not appear that those dark clouds of smoke rise from the
surface, which the author has described, p. 133. What has given rise to
the account has probably been the exhalations which often hang in a
dense cloud over the stagnant waters. Volney, i. 182. 3. Irby and
Mangles, p. 447. By far the most accurate account of the Dead Sea, is
that which is given by the authors last referred to, in their
unpublished Travels in Syria. Hitherto it had scarcely been explored by
an European traveller on the southern side, and consequently its extent,
in that direction, had been very much overrated. Including what they
call its _back-water_, a shallow bay forming a prolongation of it on the
south, (p. 454) it cannot exceed, they say, thirty miles at the utmost,
though the ancients have assigned to it a length of from seventy-five to
eighty. Nor is it possible that it should anciently have extended much
further than it now does; because at the distance of about eight or ten
miles to the south of the present limit of the backwater, a range of
cliffs completely closes the valley of the Ghor, (p. 454.) This is
therefore the utmost extent that the lake can have had in ancient times.
The saltness and bitterness of the water mentioned in the text does not
arise from a mixture of naphtha and asphaltes, but from the large
quantities of the muriates of magnesia, soda, and lime, which it
contains, amounting to a fourth part of the weight, according to Dr.
Marcet’s analysis. Phil. Trans. 1807, p. 296. Hence the great specific
gravity of the water, which has been exaggerated as if the human body
could not sink in it. Tac. Hist. v. 6.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account