Nihil certe ultra rei in Italia ab Hannibale gestum. Nam ad eum quoque
legati ab Carthagine vocantes in Africam eis forte diebus, quibus ad
Magonem, venerunt. Frendens gemensque ac vix lacrimis temperans dicitur
legatorum verba audisse. {5} Postquam edita sunt mandata, ‘Iam non
perplexe,’ inquit, ‘sed palam revocant, qui vetando supplementum et
pecuniam mitti iam pridem trahebant. Vicit ergo Hannibalem non populus
Romanus totiens caesus fugatusque, sed senatus Carthaginiensis {10}
obtrectatione atque invidia; neque hac deformitate reditus mei tam P.
Scipio exsultabit atque efferet sese quam Hanno, qui domum nostram,
quando alia re non potuit, ruina Carthaginis oppressit.’ Iam hoc ipsum
praesagiens animo praeparaverat {15} ante naves. Itaque inutili militum
turba praesidii specie in oppida Bruttii agri, quae pauca magis metu
quam fide continebantur, dimissa, quod roboris in exercitu erat in
Africam transvexit. Raro quemquam alium, patriam exilii causa
relinquentem, {20} tam maestum abisse ferunt quam Hannibalem, hostium
terra excedentem.
LIVY, xxx. 19, 20.
+Context.+ Scipio (204 B.C.) landed in Africa and won such decisive
victories over the Carthaginians under Hasdrubal, the son of Gisco, that
ii was necessary in 203 B.C. to recall both Mago and Hannibal.
[Linenotes:
3-4. +ad Magonem.+ Mago, H.’s youngest brother, had in 205 B.C. been
despatched from Carthage with considerable reinforcements for H. He
took Genoa, again roused the Gauls against Rome, and in 203 B.C.
fought an indecisive action with the Romans. Mago was severely
wounded, and died at sea before he reached Africa.
6. +Iam non perplexe+ = _now in no veiled manner_ (lit. _not
obscurely_).
8. +iam pridem trahebant+ = _began long ago to try to pull me back_.
--Rawlins.
11. +obtrectatione+ = _by disparagement_.
13. +Hanno+, the leader of the aristocratic (peace) party at
Carthage, and the persistent opponent of Hamilcar Barca and his
sons.]
+Hannibal’s Speech.+ ll. 6-15. This is purely imaginary and illustrates
the bitter hatred of the Romans for H. They alleged that H. was
personally responsible for the war, and that he undertook it for selfish
and party ends. Also that Carthage, unable to prevent the war, withheld
supplies and reinforcements. Ihne says ‘The whole course of the war is a
sufficient refutation of these charges.’
C38
SECOND PUNIC WAR, 218-202 B.C.
_Zama, 202 B.C._ (1) _Before the Battle._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account