Henry of Monmouth, Volume 1: Or, Memoirs of the Life and Character of Henry the Fifth, as Prince of Wales and King of EnglandTyler, James Endell
History
Henry of Monmouth, Volume 1: Or, Memoirs of the Life and Character of Henry the Fifth, as Prince of Wales and King of England
Tyler, James Endell
Henry V, King of England, 1387-1422
"And, to inform you fully of all that has been done, I send you a
person worthy of credit in this case, my faithful servant the
bearer of this letter, who was present at the engagement, (p. 204)
and did his duty very satisfactorily, as he does on all occasions.
And such amends has God ordained you for the burning of four houses
of your said town. And prisoners there were none taken excepting
one,[202] who was a great chieftain among them, whom I would have
sent to you, but he _cannot yet ride at his ease_.
"And touching the governance which I purpose to make after this,
please your Highness to give sure credence to the bearer of this
letter in whatever he shall lay before your Highness on my part.
And I pray God that He will preserve you always in joy and
honour, and grant me shortly to comfort you with other good news.
Written at Hereford, the said Wednesday, at night.
"Your very humble and obedient son,
"To the King, my most redoubted HENRY.
and sovereign lord and father."
[Footnote 201: All the writers who have copied this
letter, from Rymer downwards, have fallen into a
ludicrous mistake here. Reading an _n_ instead of a
_v_ in the words _J'envoia_ (I sent), they have
translated the passage, "within your lordship of
Monmouth and Jennoia." Sir Harris Nicolas first
supplied the true reading. The mistake led persons
well acquainted with Monmouthshire (among others,
the Author of these Memoirs,) to make different
inquiries as to the lordship of Jennoia: they will
now no longer wonder at the unfruitful issue of
their search.]
[Footnote 202: The author published under the name
of Otterbourne says, that Owyn's son was made
prisoner at Usk on the 25th of March, and one
thousand five hundred of his men were taken or
slain; and that, after the Feast of St. Dunstan,
his chancellor was taken. There is reason to doubt
whether that chronicler has not mistaken the place
and time of the battle to which he refers; though
it is not impossible that another battle (of which,
however, we have no authentic record,) was fought
at Usk a fortnight after the rebels were defeated
at Grosmont: Grosmont is about twenty miles distant
from Usk.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account