Henry of Monmouth, Volume 2: Or, Memoirs of the Life and Character of Henry the Fifth, as Prince of Wales and King of EnglandTyler, James Endell
History
Henry of Monmouth, Volume 2: Or, Memoirs of the Life and Character of Henry the Fifth, as Prince of Wales and King of England
Tyler, James Endell
Henry V, King of England, 1387-1422
the offending parties were cast into prison, and suffered a long
confinement, as the punishment for their misconduct on that day.
[Footnote 136: The passage of M. Petitot, in his
History, published in the year 1825, vol. vi. p.
322, which contains this accusation, is as follows:
"The Duke of Alencon fought hand to hand with the
King of England, and fell gloriously. Towards the
end of the struggle, some hundreds of peasants of
Picardy, commanded by two gentlemen of the country,
believing that the English were vanquished, came to
plunder their camp. Henry, fancying that he was
about to be attacked by a reinforcement, whose
march had been concealed from him, ordered the
massacre of the prisoners, and only excepted the
princes and generals. This barbarous order was put
into execution, and tarnished his victory."]
The inference, then, which the facts, as they are delivered by English
and French writers, compel us to draw, coincides with the professed
sentiments of all contemporaries. Those, on the one hand, who shared
the glory and were proud of the day of Agincourt, and those, on the
other, whose national pride, and wounded honour, and participation in
the calamities poured that day upon the noblest families of France,
and in the mourning spread far and wide throughout the land, caused
them to abhor the very name of Agincourt, all sanction our adoption of
that one inference: _Henry did not stain his victory by any act of
cruelty_. His character comes out of the investigation untarnished by
a suspicion of his having wantonly shed the blood of a single
fellow-creature.
To enable the reader to judge for himself how far the view taken (p. 177)
in the text is justified by the evidence, the Author has thought it
desirable to cite from different writers, French as well as English,
the passages at length in which they describe the transaction.
The Chaplain of Henry V, an eye-witness, who was himself
stationed with the baggage, and whose account is contained in the
fasciculus known as "MS. Sloane, 1776, p. 67," thus reports the
transaction:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account