be preached, and not the canons and decrees of the Pope."[897]
[Footnote 892: _Ibid._, vi., 721, 979, 980, 998.]
[Footnote 893: _L. and P._, vi., 997.]
[Footnote 894: He is said, while there, to have
privately admitted to Francis that the dispensation
of Julius II. was invalid (_ibid._, vii., 1348,
App. 8).]
[Footnote 895: _Ibid._, vi., 1425, 1426, 1427.]
[Footnote 896: On his side he was angry with
Francis for telling the Pope that Henry would side
against the Lutherans; he was afraid it might spoil
his practices with them (_ibid._, vi., 614, 707);
the Luebeckers had already suggested to Henry VIII.
that he should seize the disputed throne of Denmark
(_ibid._, vi., 428; _cf._ the present writer in
_Cambridge Modern History_, ii., 229).]
[Footnote 897: _L. and P._, vi., 1435, 1479.]
Parliament was to meet to effect this purpose in January, 1534, (p. 317)
and during the previous autumn there are the first indications,
traceable to Cromwell's hand, of an attempt to pack it. He drew up a
memorandum of such seats as were vacant from death or from other
causes; most of the new members appear to have been freely elected,
but four vacancies were filled by "the King's pleasure."[898] More
extensive and less doubtful was the royal interference in the election
of abbots. Many abbeys fell vacant in 1533, and in every case
commissioners were sent down to secure the election of the King's
nominee; in many others, abbots were induced to resign, and fresh (p. 318)
ones put in their place.[899] It is not clear that the main object was
to pack the clerical representation in the House of Lords, because
only a few of these abbots had seats there, the abbots gave much less
trouble than the bishops in Parliament, and Convocation, where they
largely outnumbered the bishops, was much more amenable than the House
of Peers, where the bishops' votes preponderated. It is more probable
that the end in view was already the dissolution of the monasteries by
means of surrender. Cromwell, who was now said to "rule everything,"[900]
was boasting that he would make his King the richest monarch in
Christendom, and his methods may be guessed from his praise of the
Sultan as a model to other princes for the authority he wielded over
his subjects.[901] Henry, however, was fortunate in 1533, even in the
matter of episcopal representation. He had, since the fall of Wolsey,
had occasion to fill up the Sees of York, Winchester, London, Durham
and Canterbury; and in this year five more became vacant: Bangor, Ely,
Coventry and Lichfield by death, and Salisbury and Worcester through
the deprivation by Act of Parliament of their foreign and absentee
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account